Preloader

Olympus Blog

In the Olympus blog you'll find the latest news about the community, tutorials, helpful resources and much more! React to the news with the emotion stickers and have fun!

Patti Harrison Had Dreams of a Tech Utopia. Silicon Valley Smashed Them

Patti Harrison, like every great comic, knows how to use her face. If you’ve seen her stealing scenes in TV shows like Tim Robinson’s I Think You Should Leave or Hulu’s Shrill, you know that she often starts out a bit demure, or pouty, before walking audiences into the deep end. She’s a bit innocent, until she’s deranged—and you’re gasping for air.

It’s that quality in Harrison’s work that WIRED borrowed for our own rather unhinged cover concept. Harrison plays five (well, actually six) of the current masters of the universe—Elon Musk, Sam Altman, Dario Amodei, Mark Zuckerberg, and Jeff Bezos (with Lauren Sánchez Bezos by his side). Combining her farcical sensibilities with our commentary on the man-heavy leader­ship of Silicon Valley worked perfectly—and she was happy to lampoon the people behind the platforms she used to enjoy. (RIP Harrison’s Twitter account.) We caught up with Harrison in London, where she had just finished a sold-out run of her show, Just Ironing Some Things Out!, and a week of performances at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

KATIE DRUMMOND: When we were putting together our WIRED Women cover, we knew we had to put the best possible woman on it. You immediately came to mind, and I can’t stress enough how much you nailed the assignment.

PATTI HARRISON: That’s such a nice intro. I want to argue with a bunch of it.

You do?

I was coming in today like, oh, I guess I didn’t really check to see what the interview was about. Then I had this natural creeping anxiety. What if this is some sort of ambush, like a transphobic takedown piece—and then it was going to launch into me having to define what a woman was.

Oh my God. Thank you for being here, Patti. You are our WIRED Woman.

I appreciate that so much. It’s very affirming.

To be honest, when we were thinking about this cover and who would be perfect for it, I knew you, and I knew you were hilarious. I had no idea that you were a trans woman. It wasn’t part of the calculus. We were just so thrilled at the idea of imagining you and your really over-the-top absurdist approach to comedy embodying these characters. That was the whole joy of it for us.

From the start, I’ve been pretty outspoken about being transgender. I just don’t talk about it a lot in my work explicitly. Or when I do acting stuff, I’m not always playing a character that’s said to be trans.

Nor should you have to.

It’s fun to kind of leave that open and nebulous, especially if it’s not important to the content of the work or the jokes I’m making. So, it is meaningful to me to get to do this on the basis of you guys liking how much I’m online talking about jism and kissing my dog on the mouth, that kind of discourse.

I mean, the kissing-the-dog-on-the-mouth discourse is so important. You are so, and I mean this as a compliment, conventionally funny. You’ve talked before about feeling pressure to incorporate politics into your work and how you don’t necessarily want to. You’ve also talked about how those things can’t really be separated. I’m curious about that line for you, because obviously sometimes we just want to make jokes about jizz and poo and kissing dogs.

I think there’s a balance. I think in our current climate of social media access, the kind of social media we have access to and how it’s been monopolized, we have been corralled Temple Grandin–style humanely into choosing to be in this very limited silo where our speech is heavily censored.

Patti Harrison Had Dreams of a Tech Utopia. Silicon Valley Smashed Them
Photograph: Emily Shur

Right.

I have strong moral views that I’m connected to. I definitely feel that it’s important to pay attention to what’s going on politically, but I think in terms of my ability to articulate, I have very scattered speech, and I forget stuff. So I have never felt that I was the right person to be speaking explicitly about those things.

But I think when you live an intrinsically politicized life, your experience is political. I don’t think people can separate morals from politics. Comedy is sat in your understanding of the truth of the world and how you either speak on that or you subvert that. So making the choice to make a bunch of comedy that’s about anything other than what’s happening in the world in and of itself is political, because it’s a reaction to wanting to escape from a reality that is giving you existential dread.

There is so much right now that just isn’t funny. How do you gesture to those more horrific realities of the news when there’s no punch line?

I feel like people en masse are being traumatized in such a specific way by what they’re seeing on a daily basis, and that juxtaposed with AI slop, I feel like it creates a high probability for people to experience a cataclysmic kind of cognitive dissonance about what they’re seeing, how their feelings are spiking from it, and what they are to believe is real and what’s not real. I think people get overwhelmed, so then they opt out.

I think a large part of that has to do with the fact that we have conflated our news intake with social media, which is horrific. I remember when Twitter was, like, comedy. It was just people tweeting, and then when they integrated the news it created this really toxic dynamic of incentivizing people to have really inflammatory political takes to get shares or retweets or whatever.

Yes.

You can talk about something horrible happening without making fun of that horrible thing. Good comedy, good art in general, is based in truth. The less filtered something is, the more raw it is, the more unabashed it is, the higher the likelihood it will connect in a deeper way, even if that means it connects with less people.

We see a lot of comedy now that is people really afraid to engage with what’s happening, and I think the lowest-hanging fruit in a lot of ways, to try and be edgy or whatever, is taking digs at transgender people or using the R-word.

People want to be shocking in their humor, and I think I’m one of those people. I’ve always been drawn to shock humor, and I think it’s just because of the way I was brought up and the way that my childhood played out. You can read all about that in my book that I’m also pushing today, sponsored by Darpa, which is so awesome that they gave me the money to self-publish this book.

The Defense Advanced Research Project Agency?

Mm-hmm.

I actually used to cover that agency as a reporter. I didn’t know that you were deeply connected to Darpa.

Yeah, and AIPAC. I take money from both, but I use it in fun, creative ways.

I had no idea they were publishing books over there.

It’s a residency. I’m allowed to write about my transgender journey, finding my womanhood, and also why we need to keep investing in robotics that are able to scan faces instantly, that are able to fly at 80 miles an hour and take a 90-degree turn instantly. Why they need to be able to carry a human amount of weight, why they need to be able to grab someone from under a bed, why they have to have that sort of prehensile grip, and why those things are necessary. And also my first time wearing makeup.

And autonomous killing.

Did I answer your question? I’m sort of in this weird soliloquy mode, and I’m going to try and give more succinct answers.

I came in here so excited and nervous about getting to talk about some stuff. Because I have felt like I’ve done interviews with magazines and online publications over the past couple of years where I’ve made a deliberate effort to talk about the feeling of gaslighting and cognitive dissonance about not being able to speak out about the genocide in Gaza without the fear of repercussions. [And then] having those sound bites or having those parts of the interviews taken out before it’s published and feeling really disappointed by that. So I think when you’re asking questions in that way it’s nice, and it feels hopeful that there’s still media that is willing to do that.

We will definitely edit you to make you sound succinct, but we will publish these parts of the interview.

It’s a chain of just ums and likes and uhs and …

Darpa.

I am trying really hard not to say “um” and “like,” and I’m not succeeding, but if you can imagine, this is way more successful than I’ve been in the past.

What is your relationship to social media now? You were kicked off Twitter early in its downswing, if I may call it that, for impersonating Nilla Wafers, right?

Yeah.

Patti Harrison Had Dreams of a Tech Utopia. Silicon Valley Smashed Them
Photograph: Emily Shur

I checked, and Donald Trump was unbanned. I think Kanye West was unbanned after Elon Musk bought the company and renamed it X. I went and looked up your account. I believe you are still banned.

I think social media as we have it is hell. Truly the most literal panopticon. We’re bugs trapped under a little glass, and it’s hard because I think the frustration is that—well, there’s multiple frustrations. One is that we all see that this is evil. We all see that this profits bad things. The money moves up a more horrific chain at each level, and our time spent there posting, we all know it makes us feel bad, but we still do it.

All that time is wasted. Our lives are wasted, and then we fund evil people who make the quality of everything worse, because it’s all interconnected. Yet we’re still on it, and there’s this anger about why can’t we just get off Instagram? But I think the other layer of that is we are also conditioned to attack each other individually instead of attacking the systemic issues, which is that they are testing these features to make sure that people become addicted. I think people are embarrassed to admit that they’re addicted to Instagram or their phones, or they’ll say it in a jokey way.

There’s an entire global economy running through these platforms. I think I read that Tim Robinson found you on Instagram and thought you were hilarious. How do you separate yourself from that, and can you?

I’ve gotten jobs on TV shows because of the way I was posting online, jokes I was making online, and that’s how I got into acting. So I do personally have this sense of like, “Oh no, if I delete this, this will end my income. This will end.” It’s really designed to make you feel that way, which is insidious, literally.

Well, in a very short amount of time social media has changed significantly. When I was in middle school and high school, I loved Xanga, and as a middle schooler, that was the first place I was writing stuff as a joke, like writing joke posts about my fake day I would have in school where I’m like, “Oh my god, Mariah Carey came into school today, and she was singing, and it was so good. The principal …” This is a bad example because that actually did happen to me.

Wait, did it actually?

No. But she should have.

I am very gullible, which is a really bad trait for a journalist.

I will keep that in mind to manipulate you later in life, but not right now in this moment.

OK, so Mariah Carey was not singing at your school?

She was.

OK, so you’re a liar.

I lie for attention and to make time pass, if that makes any sense. I listened to an audiobook, and I might butcher the title, but I believe it’s called Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, by Jaron Lanier.

I really agreed with a lot of its framing of social media in a subjective way, which is that social media—and I believe this—at its core is not an evil thing. Social media is a tool for connection. When I was on MySpace in high school in rural Ohio, I was so limited in what I had access to culturally, and completely in the closet, having no language about queerness. Having the internet and having MySpace was amazing. It really helped me find communities outside of where I lived, where there weren’t people who liked the things that I liked, and I wasn’t being bludgeoned with 5 million ads at that time. YouTube was the same.

Oh, yeah.

I remember the day I came home from school, and I went to my friend’s house who lives across the street and seeing the first YouTube ad I saw and being, like, “What the fuck?” Like, being so angry as a teenager that there was a commercial on YouTube.

When we first talked about you doing these covers, I remember you saying that you grew up looking at the technology industry and thinking, “This is amazing, and these people are doing amazing things and are going to save the world and change things for the better,” and that you have, obviously, over the years become very much disillusioned with that notion and disappointed and angry. I think that so many people share that view. Can you talk a little bit more about what your interest was in technology when you were younger and how it’s changed?

When I was a kid, I was obsessed with sci-fi and fantasy and was obsessed with The Matrix and Aliens and just anything futuristic. I loved Ghost in the Shell. I loved anything that felt like a synthesis of technology and the organic. I think a lot of that comes from just being a bored hillbilly kid.

In the show that I’m doing, I do an impression of a Boston Dynamics robot dog. And I tell the audience, “OK, I’m gonna do an impression, and you guys tell me what you think it is, and you can just yell it out.” Then I pull my shirt up over my head, and I get on all fours and jerk around the stage. I always bump into the mic stand, knock it over. Usually someone will say, like, “Darpa dog” or, like, “Boston Dynamics robot dog,” which is so funny.

Those are very specific references.

It makes me feel happy that those people are coming to my shows. But I’ll go on this long tear about how when I was a kid I was really excited about this future where there would be artificial intelligence, and there would be self-driving cars, and there would be robot animals walking amongst us.

But then there’s the disillusionment that comes with realizing that capitalism will sour everything. Capitalism reveals grifters. Capitalism reveals the rot and shows you how quickly people will fold against their proclaimed morals to make money or to make a name for themselves.

These companies, when they’re developing these robotics that have the potential to really hurt people, they promise these aren’t gonna be used in combat. We see them using these robot dogs in Gaza. We see them experimenting with this tech in combat situations. Combat, I feel, is a generous way to put it, considering it is a full-on genocide.

I don’t have a way to reconcile that at this point, because it makes you lose faith in this community that I have always seen as intrinsically progressive, because it’s science, it’s progressive by nature.

I think the idea behind capitalism is that it creates positive competition so we get innovation. But then once they see the best way we can have it, someone buys that way and then takes it away from everybody so that they can offer us shittier versions of the thing that used to be good. I feel like we used to have good social media. We used to have social media without ads, without algorithms. We saw things chronologically. Things that in moderation are good for your brain. You can learn.

I want to talk to you about AI. Do you use it?

I have used it in earlier iterations. Like Dall-E.

Oh, the image generator.

I do find it fascinating, like the technology of it. I just am horrified at the rate at which it’s immediately integrated without any sort of vetting into our society for profit. They don’t care.

It’s like “Can’t we just put a pin in this right now?” Data centers are destroying the environment. I think there are people out there who are trying to get them to stop and take the appropriate amount of time before this is implemented or do more research on it, but I just think bad people with money are expediting these processes to the point that we all suffer.

The idea of using ChatGPT or something to help me figure out what socks I should wear with my shoes feels evil.

Are there things that scare you about it creatively and artistically? Does it come up in the context of your work?

If I’m online, it’s inevitable that AI will absorb it. I have had the most fun in my career doing live shows and being in a room with an audience, and a lot of the shows that I do, I don’t record them into a special, and I do them for, like, a year and then I move on to the next show and I start to rebuild again, and that show doesn’t live on video.

Is that intentional?

I think I am pushing back ’cause I’m kind of a contrarian cunt. I’m like, “Oh, I don’t wanna make clips of my work.” I don’t feel like my jokes really work out of context in a one-minute clip.

But there’s another chunk of it—that I’m just lazy. I get bored really easily, and I don’t wanna do the same material so many times. I think a lot of people who want to film your special for you need you to be able to do it so that they can edit it together very cleanly.

I do think that as long as people will come and be in a space and gather to see something real and feel the energy in the room, that there is this certain level of safety to that—unless we have AI hologram comedians that people come to see, which I’m sure has already been on the table. Like, “Come see George Carlin’s AI.” “Come talk to George Carlin’s hologram.”

You’re pointing at something interesting that I think is true, which is, to be optimistic for a minute, a potential upside of AI and AI slop, this premium on physical products like print magazines or in-person events. Do you feel excited about that possibility? Have you noticed that in your own work, in your own life?

I have a hard time, because I think I do see a lot of stuff online in my algorithm, but then I feel afraid to speak on it because I know that there’s a world where my algorithm is completely different from everyone else’s. So I try not to let it paint my perception of the world for better or for worse, either way. But I do feel like I get a lot of content of people turning toward analog things across the board, and that is an exciting thing to me. I think my one worry with that is, what would the uptick be for waste? There was a part of the digitization of media that I thought ultimately would, on paper, be good for the climate crisis.

If we’re moving video games from being a physical purchase to an online purchase completely, where you don’t have any physical disk, any packaging, anything. That’s so much waste that you’ve just prevented, because there’s such a huge issue with whether things actually get recycled effectively.

But we’re learning that companies are like, “No, you actually don’t own that. You don’t actually own that the day we decide we don’t wanna keep it on our marketplace anymore.” So I understand why people are like, “I want physical stuff. I wanna own the thing I spent my money on.” And I think that is a direct response to the way that our capitalist economy has completely punished everyone who’s drank the Kool-Aid or hasn’t, ’cause you are participating in it even if you disagree with it, unless you’re Luigi Mangione or something.

I would love a world in which we’re all boho and we’re drawing on the wall. We’re drawing, like, Minions having sex on a wall with chalk in a cave somewhere.

That is the dream: Minions having sex on a wall in a cave. You nailed it. I’m curious about your comedy in all of this. Have you felt like you’ve needed to change your approach to comedy because people have such a hard time telling what’s true and what’s not true? Does that stress you out in the context of the way you approach your comedy?

I posted the other day, from our shoot, I had a MAGA hat …

I was so excited when I saw it.

It’s like a thirst trap. It’s me in my bra, my tits are out, and I have this hat on. I was joking in the caption. I was saying I’m finally glad to be coming out and getting away from a community that is so judgmental, meaning, like, queer people and liberals. I was coming out as MAGA as a joke, and I thought that was very clear.

Pre-algorithms I felt like my social media was my page, where people who were following me were there because they sought me out and they understood it, and they liked my work. I could post stuff within the context of them understanding my point of view about it and knowing it’s a joke. With algorithms taking over, you get so much more random harassment because your posts are completely taken out of context and thrown into other people’s feeds. It’s designed to agitate them. The algorithms know this person is not gonna like this, and they’re very likely to post about it.

What that turns into is: I’m getting harassment for a joke that I made, which I thought the people who followed me would get.

Oh, no.

I knew completely that it was edgelord-y and that I was shitposting and rage-baiting. So I’m not saying “Oh, I’m a victim” or anything. But progressive people were responding really angrily. Like, “How could you be trans and post something like this?” And like, “You really think that community’s gonna save you? Unfollowing.”

I just thought it was really interesting that these people’s cortisol levels spiked when they saw this image that they didn’t wanna see. If you took the time you took to type the comment and post it and then unfollow me, and instead you just looked at my page or did a quick scroll or read a smidge of my Wikipedia, you would see that I’m progressive and that I joke around a lot ironically.

What was also really funny is that there were MAGA people in the comments of that post being like, “That, that’s a dude with tits.” Or like, “He’s just, like, showing his man boobs” or whatever. But I’m like, at least those MAGA people who also got my post somehow in their algorithm took the time to learn that I was trans.

It’s impossible to have fun on the internet anymore because someone is always so mad at you. Someone is always so mad at WIRED for the smallest little thing, for a joke or something we think is clever or trying to be provocative, and we get in a lot of trouble online.

It’s amazing, the hypocrisy of the right wing pushing so hard, using freedom of speech as this drum that they beat as the reason why they do all these horrible things. But you can get your account taken down for saying very vague things that are not against the community guidelines of Instagram. I’ve had so many posts of mine taken down because when they started using AI to comb through people’s posts, I had a lot flagged that were like, “This post was taken down for bullying and abuse.” And it was a post where I’m talking about my friend’s comedy show and I’m like, “This bitch just tore it up.” But because I called her a bitch, it was saying that I was bullying her, and then when I tried to appeal it, it wouldn’t take it.

I was like, so where’s the line of free speech? People are commenting on my Instagram calling me a man, implying that I should kill myself, and I’m reporting these comments, and then I get the message back that’s like, “These comments did not actually go against community guidelines.”

What is the ever-moving line for freedom of speech in this context? I just don’t think we should be there anymore. Like, no matter what side of the political spectrum you’re on, it is completely destroying your nervous system and your sense of security.

It makes me really sad because I grew up in a really redneck, poor country town, like all white, all Christian pretty much, pretty conservative. There were leftist people there. I grew up with a lot of scrappy dirt-bike kids. And they are people who online are posting, like, MAGA shit. But growing up with them, there were some of them that when I came out as trans were really supportive in a shocking and surprising way, even though they were so homophobic before I came out. I think it was because they just hadn’t experienced it in their personal life.

I think a lot of right-wing people—it’s not exclusive to the right wing—but I think a lot of conservative people are hard-way learners. Like, they learn the hard way before they’re changed by it, like Milo Yiannopoulos or Marjorie Taylor Greene.

But now one of them knows that ICE detention really sucks.

Sadly, they had to learn the hard way.

But there are people who change their minds once they’re touched by something, or they are more open to conversation, then we write them off as if we’re viewing them as one shade of person because of what we see on social media, and I think it’s designed that way. It’s designed to keep us all separated.

I am feeling so hopeful about this rise in class consciousness, this peaking interest in socialism. It’s so exciting.

Patti Harrison Had Dreams of a Tech Utopia. Silicon Valley Smashed Them
Photograph: Emily Shur

Two more questions. Who is Patti Harrison’s WIRED Woman?

No, I’m going to slam the door behind me, and then I’m gonna build another pane on the glass ceiling, just to make it a lot thicker.

I mean, ugh, making me pick one of something is really fucked up.

If you had a magazine, who would you put on the cover?

Candace Owens. I’m kidding. Probably a split between Candace Owens and Erika Kirk. No, this is absolutely my nightmare.

What makes you hopeful?

I think what gives me hope is the rise in class consciousness and the rising interest in socialism. If people are waking up to the fact that we are getting the worst version of everything because of our capitalist democracy, like a sham of a democracy, I think we’ll then get to a place where we have real amazing technological advancements.

Thank you so much, Patti. Thank you for doing our covers.

Yeah, of course. When do I get paid?

Oh. Let’s talk about that after.

It’s $4 million, by the way.


Let us know what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor at [email protected].

Set design by Matilda Greenwood; hair, makeup, and prosthetics by Lily Sumner; hair by Shunsuke Meguro Using R+CO (Zuckerberg, Musk); tailoring by Faye Oakenfull; nails by Sasha Goddard at Caren using Shiseido.


Source: Culture Latest

Kate Tolo Says Her Quest to Be ‘the Female Bryan Johnson’ Is ‘for Women’

Kate Tolo got her first period at 13—an experience she says left her lying prostrate on the floor, debilitated by cramps and breaking out into a full-body sweat.

When she told her dad why she was home from school early, she remembers him saying, “We don’t talk about that female stuff.” Then he walked away.

For most of her teenage years, that was how Tolo thought about her period—as something “you just didn’t talk about.” When she was in her early twenties and experienced extreme pain while defecating, sending her to the emergency room, a doctor suggested Tolo may have endometriosis, a chronic disease believed to affect an estimated 10 percent of women of reproductive age, according to WHO data.

Caused by an overgrowth of endometrium-like tissue (uterine lining), endometriosis is primarily characterized by extremely heavy and painful periods, as well as pelvic floor dysfunction, bowel issues, and dyspareunia (pain during sex). The doctor recommended Tolo have a laparoscopy, an invasive surgical procedure required to get an official diagnosis and remove endometriosis tissue. But she refused: “I wasn’t going to undergo an invasive surgical procedure, or cut myself open,” she says. “That just wasn’t an option for me.”

Then in early 2026, Tolo started developing a concierge health service with her boyfriend Bryan Johnson, the technologist-cum-multimillionaire-cum-biohacker known for his quest to become immortal via rigid self-optimization and wellness protocols. During a clinical intake, she shared her lifelong struggle with suspected endometriosis—and he became obsessed with finding a cure.

Since hard-launching their relationship last December, Johnson has positioned his girlfriend as “the female Bryan Johnson,” with Tolo adopting a rigorous self-tracking protocol to optimize her health. Using $2.6 million in funding from Immortals, the wellness company the two founded, Tolo is tracking more than 1,500 biomarkers from sources such as her blood, urine, and stool over the course of her menstrual cycle, via “an elaborately choreographed four-hour techno ballet of scratching, sniffing, spitting, scanning, stretching, gripping, vibrating, flexing, plucking, poking, pulling, peeing, and pooping,” as one recent Business Insider profile put it.

It’s a relatively new role for the 30-year-old Tolo, who worked in fashion marketing before becoming Johnson’s executive assistant and special projects director for Kernel, his neurotech company, in 2021.

Describing herself as an introvert, she says she was initially uneasy about becoming “the world’s most measured woman,” as Johnson put it in a video from last August. (He’s also declared her vagina’s microbiome to be in the “top 1 percent” of all vaginal ecosystems.) Prone to depression and anxiety, she had a panic attack on week two of the protocol, prompted by her internet going down while she was trying to conduct red-light therapy. “It’s a deeply uncomfortable experience for someone who doesn’t love a routine,” she concedes. “And so all of that pressure just really got to me.”

But to hear her tell it, it all serves a larger purpose.

“Even when every part of me, individually, is screaming ‘Make it stop,’ I can see myself pushing myself to the absolute limit of what is possible, mentally and also physically, in my body. Because I’m doing this for women,” she tells me.

One of Tolo’s primary interests is coming up with reliable diagnostic and treatment methods for endometriosis, a process that the couple has been documenting on their social channels. Though Tolo never underwent surgery and has never been officially diagnosed with endometriosis, so far the two claim they have diagnosed Tolo with the condition over the course of 42 days using noninvasive methods, such as a saliva and blood test and an endo-specific ultrasound. (A transvaginal ultrasound and an initial MRI originally came back clear.) Their next step is creating an organoid using cells from Tolo’s menstrual blood—“essentially, me in a petri dish,” as she explains it—to test various interventions, the results of which she will compare next to a more conventional biopsy.

For the past few months, Tolo has been collecting her menstrual blood in a cup and transferring it to a standing tube, repeating the process every few hours before shipping it off on ice in a Styrofoam container to be tested by a lab. (The couple will not reveal which lab they are partnered with, saying it prefers to remain anonymous: “The biotech world is sometimes a little bit more buttoned-up about how they go about things,” Tolo says.)

The blood collection process is grueling and laborious: “It’s like this race against the clock to get into the lab in time before the cells die,” she says. But she dreams of a world in which women would be able to collect their menstrual blood, then send it into a lab for testing in order to obtain an endometriosis diagnosis. “We want to confirm that women can do this without having minor surgery,” she says.

Endometriosis has historically been extremely difficult to diagnose, says Kristin Riley, the chief of minimally invasive gynecological surgery at Penn State Health. The disease can manifest itself in various ways, and the amount of endometriosis present in the reproductive organs does not necessarily correlate to the severity of the symptoms. And while physicians can make a clinical diagnosis based on patient self-reporting and ultrasound imaging, the “gold standard” for determining the presence of endometriosis is still surgery, says Riley. For this reason, it can take between five to 10 years to diagnose a case of endometriosis.

Over the past few years, the market has been flush with efforts to come up with simpler diagnostic tests. In the United Kingdom, for instance, Endotest, marketed as the world’s first commercially available saliva-based diagnostic test, was recently approved for temporary clinical use. The test examines biomarkers called microRNAs that may indicate the presence of endometriosis in a patient’s body. But though the test shows “promise,” Riley says, it’s unlikely it will be approved for mass distribution anytime soon in the United States, or that physicians will start using it in lieu of laparoscopy.

Physicians who treat endometriosis regularly are also skeptical that Tolo and Johnson’s methods will yield helpful results, given the extremely limited sample size. “There’s something to be gained from all different types of research, but before something can be adopted widely into practice, it has to be really well proven,” says Ilana Ressler, an ob-gyn at Illume Fertility in Connecticut. In order for Tolo’s project to be successful, the results “would have to be applicable to a general population, and not just one person.”

On social media and in our discussions, Johnson has framed his interest in curing endometriosis as purely a labor of love. “I’m desperately in love with Kate,” he says. “[I] want her to be happy and well, and it’s been so many years she’s had to live with all this pain, and I just want to help do this for her.”

Some of the couple’s efforts to highlight the struggles of living with endometriosis, such as an X post of Johnson standing between Tolo’s legs as she gets a vaginal ultrasound, have raised eyebrows for skirting the bounds of tastefulness. It’s a critique that bothers Johnson. “Why can’t we talk about these things openly?” he asks when I bring it up. “Why does this have to be so political? Why can’t this just be seen as a loving gesture?”

Tolo, however, whose background is in marketing, gets it. “From day one, I’ve seen my job as: How can I help the world understand Bryan and who he is?” she says. “I probably missed how important it was for me to be a part of that story from the beginning. [But] now, I think people understand the both of us better than they ever have.”

Tolo’s public quest to highlight a debilitating but poorly understood reproductive health issue, as well as Johnson’s fervent support, have translated into a positive shift in public perception, particularly toward Johnson himself. Since he started advocating for extreme anti-aging procedures, such as intergenerational blood plasma transfusions or penile rejuvenation injections, Johnson has long been derided as an out-of-touch Silicon Valley weirdo. Yet his quest to treat his girlfriend’s endometriosis, coupled with his obvious affection for Tolo (at multiple points during our conversation, he compares their relationship to that of Abigail and John Adams), have endeared him more to the public. “I’m so happy Bryan found his soulmate and proved true love exists,” reads one representative tweet.

True to form, Johnson has quantified how going public with his love for Tolo has contributed to this shift. “I built a couple of AI agents and I scraped all of the social commentary about me over the past five years,” he told me. A few years ago, he estimates, it was 80 percent negative; now, he says, it is “70 to 75 percent positive.”

Going public has also, undoubtedly, been a boon for Tolo’s profile: Since April 2026, when Johnson posted about Tolo’s vaginal microbiome, she has more than tripled her Instagram following, according to data from SocialBlade, a firm that tracks creators’ influence.

When I ask if the couple plans to funnel this surge of attention into, say, developing a product for their company, Immortals, which provides personalized health concierge services, Johnson and Tolo demur. But it’s worth noting that Immortals has forayed into women’s health and wellness products, including topical estradiol for postmenopausal women and tretinoin cream to combat the signs of aging. And since the approval of Endotest in the UK, there’s been increased interest in the burgeoning endometriosis diagnostic test industry, which a recent GlobalData report estimates will be worth $2.5 billion by 2034.

Tolo says that it’s simply too early to tell whether a menstrual blood diagnostic test is feasible, noting that it will take the couple at least another eight to 12 months to conclude all of their research. But she concedes that the ideal outcome would be bringing an endo diagnostic blood test to market. For the time being, however, she says, “our ultimate goal is to make as much as we can about female health public so we can spur the entire industry” to develop noninvasive diagnostic tests.

Among the other experiments Tolo is subjecting herself to are tracking her nighttime erections with a small device she calls a “techno tampon” and using a sauna to see how her menstrual cycle would be affected by extreme heat, with Tolo taking a temperature-tracking pill before trying to push her core temperature to a brutal 102.4 degrees.

After 25 minutes in the sauna, Tolo started feeling nauseous and having headaches. Johnson says he became concerned about her and encouraged her to step out, but she refused. “She’s very sincere when she says she’s doing this for women,” he says.

Tolo stays quiet. She’d just gotten an x-ray of her abdomen to ensure that the tracking pill hadn’t gotten lodged in her stomach, and she seems a little bit more depleted than she had in our past conversations.

I ask what it felt like to be in such an intense physical situation, and what was going through her mind. She answers almost immediately.

“I wasn’t getting out of there. There was no other option,” she says. “I felt sick at times. I didn’t know how reasonable or logical I was being, if I was losing my bearings, if I was going to pass out. But I wasn’t going to waste the opportunity to do something on behalf of half the population.”

OK, I ask, but did it have to be her? Did Kate Tolo’s body have to become the most tracked female body in the world?

“I don’t know what other individual woman would have the time, the access, the level of privilege to be able to take this journey,” she says. “So I’m taking myself out of this and saying from a humanity perspective, in 2026, this is the right thing for this human in this body to do, in service of all the other women out there.”


Source: Culture Latest

Simple visual patterns can trick AI-powered vehicles and robots

Simple visual patterns can trick AI-powered vehicles and robots

Sadie Harley

Scientific Editor

Robert Egan

Senior Editor

Simple visual patterns can trick AI-powered vehicles and robots, UF research finds
Researchers projected a simple striped pattern onto the back of a vehicle. The pattern caused the autonomous vehicle’s perception system to interpret part of the vehicle as being closer than it actually was and enough to trigger an automatic response such as braking. Credit: University of Florida

A simple pattern of black-and-white stripes could cause an autonomous vehicle or robot to misjudge how far away an obstacle is, potentially triggering an unexpected maneuver or even a collision, according to new University of Florida research.

The finding exposes a previously overlooked vulnerability in the technology that autonomous systems use to perceive depth—a critical capability for vehicles, drones and robots navigating their surroundings. The study will be presented in November at the Association for Computing Machinery Conference on Computer and Communications Security, or ACM CCS and appears on the preprint server arXiv.

Researchers found that repeated patterns in the environment can interfere with the algorithms and artificial intelligence models that estimate the distance between a camera and an object. By manipulating the pattern, an attacker could make an obstacle appear significantly closer or farther away than it really is.

But the problem doesn’t necessarily require an attacker, said Sara Rampazzi, Ph.D., an assistant professor in the Department of Computer and Information Science and Engineering at UF.

“These things can also happen naturally, so it’s not a matter of imagining a sophisticated attacker. It becomes a safety problem,” said Rampazzi, lead of the research effort.

Simple visual patterns can trick AI-powered vehicles and robots, research finds
The attack induces controlled shifts in depth estimation of stereo cameras by exploiting an inherent vulnerability triggered by simple patterns with repeating elements. Credit: https://arxiv.org/html/2609.16336v1

Repeated patterns distort stereo depth

The research focuses on autonomous systems that use stereo cameras—two cameras positioned close together—to estimate depth. These systems can use specific algorithms or artificial intelligence to make the same calculation from images captured by the cameras.

Although the approaches differ, the researchers found they share an underlying weakness. Repeated visual patterns, like stripes on a fence or other regularly spaced objects, can cause the systems to incorrectly calculate depth.

Rampazzi’s team, in collaboration with two universities in Japan, tested multiple sensors, algorithms and AI models and found the same fundamental vulnerability across them, suggesting the problem is not limited to a particular manufacturer or application.

In a driving scenario, for example, researchers projected a simple checkerboard-like pattern onto the back of a vehicle. The pattern caused the autonomous vehicle’s perception system to interpret part of the vehicle as closer than it actually was—close enough to trigger an automatic response such as braking.

The same type of vulnerability could affect drones and ground robots, which rely on depth perception to avoid buildings, vehicles, birds and other obstacles while following an assigned route.

Simple visual patterns can trick AI-powered vehicles and robots, UF research finds
The research team tested multiple sensors, algorithms and AI models and found the same fundamental vulnerability across them. Credit: University of Florida

Small patterns, sudden maneuvers

“For a self-driving vehicle, an unexpected hard brake could create a hazard for vehicles following behind it,” Rampazzi said. “For a drone or robot, an incorrect depth estimate could cause a sudden maneuver or collision.”

The researchers also demonstrated that an attacker would not necessarily need to cover an entire scene with a pattern. A small, strategically placed pattern can be enough to influence the depth calculation.

Fixing the underlying depth calculation

Rampazzi said the research team also developed defenses designed to address the underlying cause of the vulnerability rather than simply training AI models with more examples of problematic patterns.

For traditional depth-estimation algorithms, the researchers developed a software-based change that can recognize situations involving repeated patterns and prevent the system from selecting an incorrect depth calculation. For AI-based systems, they modified the models so they can respond differently when those patterns appear.

The researchers tested their approach using simulations as well as a real vehicle and sensors at UF’s controlled autonomous-vehicle testing facility.

Resilience beyond training data

Rampazzi said the work illustrates a broader challenge as AI becomes increasingly responsible for interpreting the physical world.

“We try to find and resolve the root cause of the problem, instead of just adding more data on it, like having a more fancy AI model on it,” she said.

Rather than simply teaching an AI system to recognize every possible problematic pattern, she said, the researchers focus on addressing weaknesses inherited from the sensing and depth-estimation systems underneath the AI to make the technology more resilient to both deliberate attacks and unexpected conditions in the real world.

Publication details

Sri Hrushikesh Varma Bhupathiraju et al, Illusion of Depth: Revealing Hidden Stereo Vision Vulnerabilities in Depth Estimation, arXiv (2026). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2609.16336

Journal information:
arXiv

Key concepts

Computational 3D vision

Who’s behind this story?

Sadie Harley

Sadie Harley

BSc Life Sciences & Ecology. Microbiology lab background with pharmaceutical news experience in oil, gas, and renewable industries.

Full profile →


Robert Egan

Robert Egan

Bachelor’s in mathematical biology, Master’s in creative writing. Well-traveled with unique perspectives on science and language.

Full profile →

Citation:
Simple visual patterns can trick AI-powered vehicles and robots (2026, September 23)
retrieved 24 September 2026
from https://techxplore.com/news/2026-09-simple-visual-patterns-ai-powered.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Source: Tech Xplore

Fat in ice cream waste can be economically recycled, study suggests

Fat in ice cream waste can be economically recycled, study suggests

Gaby Clark

Scientific Editor

Andrew Zinin

Chief Editor

ice cream
Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain

Millions of pounds of nutrient-rich ice cream are discarded after production each year, according to the International Dairy Foods Association. Nearly 5% of the raw materials used in ice cream production end up as waste—representing millions of dollars in lost product per year. This waste primarily comes from batches discarded because of quality issues and waste generated during equipment cleaning. Regulations aimed at preventing cross-contamination with allergens have also greatly increased the amount of discarded ice cream over the past two decades.

Researchers in Penn State’s College of Agricultural Sciences say one answer may be to recycle the ice cream waste. They found that it is possible to recover a large amount of fat at a potentially economical cost. Recovered fat could replace a pork fat called choice white grease that is mainly used in animal feed, or be transformed into compounds for use in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and other products, the team said. They published their findings in Cleaner Engineering and Technology.

The researchers found that ice cream waste, which typically has a fat content three to five times that of cow’s milk, doesn’t necessarily need complicated treatment to recover its fat. Simple separation, particularly centrifugation—a mechanical process that uses rapid spinning to separate mixtures of different sizes, shapes and densities—with alkaline treatment as a possible aid, can do the job.

“Here in the Department of Food Science at Penn State, we have a close relationship with the food industry, so it was through our industry partners that we first heard about the magnitude of the ice cream waste problem,” said study senior author Yi Zhang, Frederik Sr. and Faith E. Rasmussen Career Development Professor in Food Science. “After offering the Ice Cream Short Course for over 100 years, we have ties to nearly every major ice cream company in the world, so we wanted to see whether we could help solve the problem.”

In the study, the team worked with Perry’s Ice Cream in Akron, New York, which shipped about 90 pounds (41 kilograms) of frozen ice cream waste per batch—with fat content ranging from 1.8% to 10.3%—from four production batches that had been mixed at the ice cream manufacturing facility.

The first approach researchers tried to collect the milk fat was a process called proteolysis—using enzymes like pepsin, trypsin and bromelain to break down proteins that help stabilize the fat emulsion. The second approach was pH shifting, in which they made the waste strongly acidic (pH 2 or 4) or alkaline (pH 11) to destabilize the emulsion. After treatment, they centrifuged the material to separate the fat.

The team measured fat recovery—how much of the original fat they successfully recovered—and fat purity—how much of the recovered material was actually fat rather than proteins, water and other compounds. The result was somewhat surprising, Zhang noted.

“You might expect enzymes to be essential for breaking up the emulsion, but our study found that you don’t necessarily need them,” she said. “The untreated control, when simply processed by centrifugation, recovered about 95% of the fat and actually improved fat purity compared with the original waste.”

Short enzyme treatments of one to two hours sometimes helped fat separation, but longer treatment, higher temperatures and extensive proteolysis did not increase the total amount of fat recovered and could decrease fat purity. The pH experiments found that pH 11—strongly alkaline conditions—separated fat better than acidic conditions.

To analyze the economic implications of their findings, study co-author Rui Shi, assistant professor in Penn State’s Robert V. Waltemeyer Department of Chemical Engineering, and her team built a techno-economic model to evaluate how the fat recovery approaches could be incorporated into industrial processes. They estimated that the minimum selling price per kilogram—slightly more than 2 pounds—of recovered fat would be about 40 cents. Selling the recovered fat above this price could provide an opportunity for profit, Zhang said.

The economics depended heavily on how much fat was present in the incoming ice cream waste, Zhang explained. Higher-fat waste makes the process more profitable because roughly the same amount of waste is processed to obtain more valuable product. The findings indicated that larger-scale processing operations could improve profitability.

She and her collaborators continue to explore value-added products from recovered fat, recycling and reuse pathways for other recoverable byproducts in ice cream waste, such as proteins and sugars, and potential applications for using ice cream waste as a whole.

Contributing to the research at Penn State were first author Fuad Ale-Enriquez, postdoctoral scholar in the Department of Food Science; Robert Roberts, professor and head of the Department of Food Science; Farhad Zaker Hosseiny, doctoral candidate in the Department of Chemical Engineering; and Zhe Xu, who graduated with a master’s degree in biotechnology. Brian Perry, with Perry’s Ice Cream Company, also collaborated on the project.

More information

Fuad Ale-Enriquez et al, Low-cost fat recovery from industrial ice cream waste: Separation mechanisms, process modeling, and techno-economic feasibility, Cleaner Engineering and Technology (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.clet.2026.101270

Who’s behind this story?

Gaby Clark

Gaby Clark

MA in English, copy editor since 2021 with experience in higher education and health content. Dedicated to trustworthy science news.

Full profile →


Andrew Zinin

Andrew Zinin

Master’s in physics with research experience. Long-time science news enthusiast. Plays key role in Science X’s editorial success.

Full profile →

Citation:
Fat in ice cream waste can be economically recycled, study suggests (2026, September 23)
retrieved 24 September 2026
from https://techxplore.com/news/2026-09-fat-ice-cream-economically-recycled.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Source: Tech Xplore

Major producer of world's medical isotope supply is giant step closer to using proliferation-resistant nuclear fuel

Major producer of world’s medical isotope supply is giant step closer to using proliferation-resistant nuclear fuel

Gaby Clark

Scientific Editor

Andrew Zinin

Chief Editor

Major producer of world's medical isotope supply is giant step closer to using proliferation-resistant nuclear fuel
Argonne has led technical aspects of the research reactor conversion program since its inception in 1978, reducing the availability of and need for highly enriched uranium around the world. Credit: Argonne National Laboratory

For decades, nonproliferation scientists and engineers at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Argonne National Laboratory have helped convert the fuel in dozens of research reactors around the world so they can operate safely and more securely. They find ways to change systems that rely on highly enriched uranium fuel, which can be used to make weapons, to systems that use low-enriched uranium fuel. With every fuel conversion, Argonne has gained experience, insight and a reputation for expertise in solving some of the toughest reactor conversion problems.

Now, Argonne has helped researchers in Belgium achieve a significant technical milestone in what might be its most involved effort to date. Argonne scientists and engineers helped demonstrate safety metrics needed by Belgium’s nuclear regulators to approve the fuel conversion in the BR2 research reactor at Belgium’s nuclear research center, SCK CEN.

The BR2 research reactor is one of Europe’s most complex and one of its most important because it is a leading materials testing reactor and producer of medical isotopes and semiconductor materials. By working together, the American and Belgian experts are helping to secure these capabilities while lowering the risk of anyone diverting the research reactor’s fuel to make weapons.

A source of hope and connection

The BR2 reactor is responsible for producing about one-fourth of the world’s supply of molybdenum-99, an isotope that decays into technetium-99m. Technetium-99m is widely used to diagnose a range of health conditions, including heart disease and cancer. BR2 also plays an important role in the production of therapeutic radioisotopes such as lutetium-177 and terbium-161; hospitals and communities depend on these medical isotopes to improve public health.

BR2 is also used for other valuable work, including a wide range of materials experiments and silicon doping. Doping is the process of intentionally adding impurities to a material to alter its properties. In silicon, this helps create semiconductors used in technologies such as electric vehicles, wind turbines and other high-power electronics.

Converting the fuel system in a nuclear reactor is always a challenge. Any proposed changes must be evaluated according to international standards to demonstrate continued safety, efficiency and functionality. However, BR2 is especially challenging because it is a high-performance research reactor with a wide range of specialized uses.

According to Jeremy Licht, a principal nuclear engineer who manages Argonne’s Research Reactor Methods group, BR2 operates seven times a year in 30-day cycles. Its core can be reconfigured from one cycle to the next to support a wide range of user needs.

“BR2 is an impressive reactor with a highly flexible core,” Licht said. “That creates a challenge during conversion because we need a design that reflects how the reactor is actually used, and then we have to show it can meet safety requirements across a wide range of uses.”

Licht is among more than a dozen Argonne experts responsible for the technical support for Belgium’s research reactor conversion. This work has already spanned a decade. The team’s recent success reflects Argonne’s expertise in research reactor analysis and the use of Argonne-developed codes trusted throughout the nuclear community to evaluate reactor safety and fuel performance.

“We’re not done yet, but it is a major milestone to complete the fuel qualification and conversion safety analysis work so that SCK CEN could submit its conversion authorization request to their regulator,” he said.

SCK CEN recently submitted the BR2 safety assessment report to its national regulator, the Federal Agency for Nuclear Control. SCK CEN is working to obtain approval for the fuel conversion proposal in 2027 and to begin converting systems soon afterward.

Europe is home to three other high-performance research reactors of similar complexity. The SCK CEN milestone shows that these highly complex research reactors can also be converted to use more proliferation-resistant fuels. With each successful conversion, Argonne is improving nuclear security worldwide while sustaining reactors that provide a broad range of benefits to society.

Key concepts

Critical mineral supply

Who’s behind this story?

Gaby Clark

Gaby Clark

MA in English, copy editor since 2021 with experience in higher education and health content. Dedicated to trustworthy science news.

Full profile →


Andrew Zinin

Andrew Zinin

Master’s in physics with research experience. Long-time science news enthusiast. Plays key role in Science X’s editorial success.

Full profile →

Citation:
Major producer of world’s medical isotope supply is giant step closer to using proliferation-resistant nuclear fuel (2026, September 23)
retrieved 24 September 2026
from https://techxplore.com/news/2026-09-major-world-medical-isotope-giant.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Source: Tech Xplore

Tiny OLED pixels can be manufactured like microchips using chemical-resistant polymers

Tiny OLED pixels can be manufactured like microchips using chemical-resistant polymers

Swati Mestri

Scientific Editor

Robert Egan

Senior Editor

New polymer design enables smaller OLED-pixcels
Credit: Shao-Wei Lo

Screens are becoming smaller and sharper. This can be seen, for example, in augmented reality glasses and the electronic viewfinders of cameras, some of which have a screen diagonal of less than 1 centimeter (0.4 inches).

But the smaller the screen pixels, the more difficult they are to manufacture. Organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) show promise for particularly small pixels. Unlike conventional light-emitting diodes, they are not made of crystals but of carbon-based compounds. While conventional light-emitting diodes become dimmer as the crystals are cut smaller, organic light-emitting materials can be used to produce tiny yet bright pixels.

Until now, organic light-emitting materials were not suitable for the high-precision manufacturing methods used in the semiconductor industry. Photolithography, a method used in the industry, involves solvents and other chemicals that attack and degrade organic molecules.

Photoresists for lithography

Researchers at ETH Zurich have now made organic luminescent molecules suitable for photolithography. They produced luminescent polymers in various colors that serve as photoresists while withstanding harsh chemical conditions. The polymers can be applied to a semiconductor chip. The photoresists cross-link when exposed to UV light, enabling the creation of fine-scale geometric structures.

“We’ve developed a new class of long-chain molecules that can be manufactured into OLED pixels using direct light exposure,” says Yinyin Bao, who conducted research at ETH Zurich and is now a professor at the University of Helsinki. He led the research with ETH professor Chih-Jen Shih.

They published their findings in the journal Nature.

New polymer design enables smaller OLED-pixcels
Photopatterns based on new polymers by photolithography. Credit: Yinyin Bao

Protective shell, luminescent core

To protect the sensitive luminescent molecules from aggressive chemicals, the researchers developed a molecular complex based on the core-shell principle. At its center lies the color-emitting molecule. Surrounding it are arms arranged in a star-like pattern, with outer ends that react to UV light. When exposed to light, they cross-link with the arms of other stars. This renders the material insoluble in that area, a property used in photolithography.

The inner part of the arms also serves an important function: It keeps the reactive ends at a distance from the luminescent molecule, shielding it. A co-author of the study from RMIT University in Melbourne further investigated this protective effect using computer simulations.

“We separate the two functions spatially,” Shih explains. “The light-emitting molecule is protected inside, while the reactive cross-linking groups are on the outside. This allows the photoresist to react during lithography without causing significant damage to the light-emitting core.”

Highest-resolution multicolor fluorescent image to date

The researchers demonstrated how precisely the method can pattern differently colored luminescent materials by producing a high-resolution image of a macaw parrot. It measures 300 by 430 micrometers and consists of 250 by 350 pixels.

The static image is made up of fluorescent colors; it is not yet a display. Its pixels are excited by external light, causing them to fluoresce, rather than powered electrically. It is the highest-resolution multicolor fluorescent image produced using photolithography to date.

The researchers showed that the method can also produce electrically powered light-emitting diodes using another test image: a glowing ETH logo measuring 1 by 2.4 millimeters. This was developed in collaboration with the group led by Hua Wang, a professor of electronics at ETH Zurich.

Tiny OLED pixels can be manufactured like microchips
ETH logo made up of tiny light-emitting diodes. The logo measures 1 by 2.4 millimeters. Credit: Lo SW et al. Nature (2026).

Next, the researchers aim to further reduce the pixel size of the light-emitting diodes. Producing a functioning screen will also require electronics that allow the individual pixels to be controlled independently.

Shih sees potential applications not only in small screens but also in tiny light sources for medical technology and devices for biological and neuroscientific research. “We can use this to generate light on a small scale and with high precision exactly where it is needed,” Shih says.

Tiny OLEDs could, for example, be used in research equipment to examine individual biological cells or to stimulate nerve cells in a petri dish with light. Very small, precisely controllable light sources could thus be produced directly on microchips and could also be useful in microscopy and sensors.

Publication details

Shao-Wei Lo et al, Electroluminescent photoresists extending lithographic scaling to OLEDs, Nature (2026). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-026-11042-0

Journal information:
Nature

Key concepts

Semiconductor device fabricationStretchable bioelectronics

Provided by
ETH Zurich

Who’s behind this story?

Swati Mestri

Swati Mestri

Swati Mestri holds a bachelor’s degree in Electronics Engineering and has worked as a content editor since 2019. She has experience editing research documents across technology, health care, and materials science, and has a particular interest in technology and space.

Full profile →


Robert Egan

Robert Egan

Bachelor’s in mathematical biology, Master’s in creative writing. Well-traveled with unique perspectives on science and language.

Full profile →

Citation:
Tiny OLED pixels can be manufactured like microchips using chemical-resistant polymers (2026, September 23)
retrieved 24 September 2026
from https://techxplore.com/news/2026-09-tiny-oled-pixels-microchips-chemical.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Source: Tech Xplore

New robotic hand can walk, press keys and move objects on its own

New robotic hand can walk, press keys and move objects on its own

Paul Arnold

Author

Lisa Lock

Scientific Editor

Robert Egan

Senior Editor

New robotic hand can walk, press keys and move objects on its own
Onboard power, sensing, and computation make the commercial hand self-contained. On the right is the corresponding NVIDIA Isaac Sim model, showing the stance-calibrated control frame V (colored axes) and the support polygon formed by the five fingertip contacts. Credit: arXiv (2026). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2609.17172

For many of us, the last—and only—time we’ve seen a walking hand was Thing in “The Addams Family” movies or TV series. Now there’s another. Engineers from the Soft Robotics Lab at ETH Zurich have adapted an off-the-shelf detached robotic hand so it can crawl across different surfaces, balance and interact with its environment.

But this is no sci-fi gimmick. Fully mobile robotic hands could be useful in hard-to-reach spaces. “A robotic hand with its own mobility could operate in confined workspaces without requiring the arm that normally carries it to follow,” says the research team.

Less than handy robotic hands

Until now, robotic hands trying to walk on their own ran into a major design catch. Previous projects made hands walk by giving them symmetrical fingers. That made crawling easier, but it meant moving away from the unequal fingers and opposed thumb of a conventional human-like robotic hand.

Those differences in finger shape and size help standard robotic hands handle everyday objects. But their uneven lengths make walking without tipping over more difficult because each fingertip has a different reach.

A team led by Amir Kazemi overcame these limitations by teaching an off-the-shelf, human-like hand with unequal fingers to balance, crawl and work independently. The team describes how it did so in a paper posted to the arXiv preprint server.

The team mounted a battery, motion sensors and a miniature computer on the back of the robotic hand and taught it to move and balance using reinforcement learning in a computer simulator. Then they put it to the test.

The hand crawled across 14 different indoor and outdoor surfaces, including carpet, gravel, grass and metal grating. In 25 tests that started with it lying on either side, it pushed itself back upright and recovered its stance 21 times.

Putting its fingers to work

The robot performed other tasks, too. While balancing its weight on four fingers, the hand lifted its remaining finger to press four different arrow keys. It hit the correct key 29 out of 32 times.

In another test, the hand walked up to a small block and pushed it across a table, placing it within two centimeters (0.8 inches) of the target spot during 15 tests.

Looking ahead, the team believes its approach could change how mobile robots work in human environments. “Giving robotic hands their own mobility could make future robots more versatile in the spaces and interfaces built for people.”

Written for you by our author Paul Arnold, edited by Lisa Lock, and fact-checked and reviewed by Robert Egan—this article is the result of careful human work. We rely on readers like you to keep independent science journalism alive.
If this reporting matters to you, please consider a donation (especially monthly). You’ll get an ad-free account as a thank-you.

Publication details

Amirhossein Kazemipour et al, Fingers as Legs: Learning Self-Supported Locomotion and Manipulation with an Anthropomorphic Hand, arXiv (2026). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2609.17172

GitHub project page

Journal information:
arXiv

Key concepts

Embodied robotic manipulation

Who’s behind this story?

Paul Arnold

Paul Arnold

BSc Biology from University of London. BBC documentary producer with world travel experience. Freelances from southern Spain.

Full profile →


Lisa Lock

Lisa Lock

BA art history, MA material culture. Former museum editor, paramedic, and transplant coordinator. Editing for Science X since 2021.

Full profile →


Robert Egan

Robert Egan

Bachelor’s in mathematical biology, Master’s in creative writing. Well-traveled with unique perspectives on science and language.

Full profile →

© 2026 Science X Network

Citation:
New robotic hand can walk, press keys and move objects on its own (2026, September 23)
retrieved 24 September 2026
from https://techxplore.com/news/2026-09-robotic-keys.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Source: Tech Xplore

Distributed system groups English text more accurately than conventional methods, tests find

Distributed system groups English text more accurately than conventional methods, tests find

Lisa Lock

Scientific Editor

Andrew Zinin

Chief Editor

Spark flies to organize text
Spark architecture. Credit: International Journal of Intelligent Information and Database Systems (2026). DOI: 10.1504/ijiids.2026.156312

A distributed computing framework can group large volumes of English text more accurately and efficiently than older methods, according to research published in the International Journal of Intelligent Information and Database Systems. The system could support faster analysis in education, government and business by automatically sorting related blocks of text into groups, or clusters.

The work addresses a practical problem in digital transformation: Much of the information generated by organizations is unstructured text whose meaning can vary with context. Conventional clustering methods are often slow or produce inconsistent groupings when handling large, high-dimensional data sets.

The researchers used Apache Spark, a platform for processing data across multiple computers, with an improved K-means algorithm. K-means groups data according to similarities. The researchers modified the method to use density peaks and maximum-minimum criteria to select better starting points for clusters, rather than relying on random initialization.

In tests on multiple data sets, the new approach improved clustering accuracy by more than 10% compared with conventional K-means methods. The system remained stable as the researchers increased the volume of data processed. They also improved parallel performance by adding computing nodes.

The framework could help organizations organize and extract information from growing collections of English-language documents more efficiently while providing a more consistent basis for subsequent data analysis and decision-making.

Publication details

Xiaochao Yao, English digital transformation algorithm for distributed big data based on Spark, International Journal of Intelligent Information and Database Systems (2026). DOI: 10.1504/ijiids.2026.156312

Provided by
Inderscience

Who’s behind this story?

Lisa Lock

Lisa Lock

BA art history, MA material culture. Former museum editor, paramedic, and transplant coordinator. Editing for Science X since 2021.

Full profile →


Andrew Zinin

Andrew Zinin

Master’s in physics with research experience. Long-time science news enthusiast. Plays key role in Science X’s editorial success.

Full profile →

Citation:
Distributed system groups English text more accurately than conventional methods, tests find (2026, September 23)
retrieved 24 September 2026
from https://techxplore.com/news/2026-09-groups-english-text-accurately-conventional.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Source: Tech Xplore

Rivian R2 vs. Tesla Model Y: An electric SUV showdown

Rivian R2 vs. Tesla Model Y: An electric SUV showdown

Andrew Zinin

Chief Editor

Rivian R2 vs. Tesla Model Y, an Edmunds electric SUV showdown
This photo provided by Edmunds shows the Rivian R2. The R2 is a charming electric SUV that distills everything Edmunds likes about the three-row Rivian R1S into a smaller, more affordable package. Credit: Courtesy of Edmunds via AP

The Tesla Model Y has been the sales king of small electric SUVs since the moment it arrived. Many rivals have chased its success, but none have come close. Now it’s Rivian’s turn. The Rivian R2 is the California EV automaker’s first small electric SUV, and it’s gunning for the Model Y. Rivian’s R1T truck and larger R1S SUV are excellent EVs, but their $80,000-ish price tags put them out of reach for most shoppers. At a starting price of about $45,000, the R2 is finally a Rivian many Americans can afford. To help you decide, Edmunds compared these two head-to-head to find out which is the better buy.

Range and charging

The Rivian R2’s range spans from 275 miles in the base Standard model to 345 miles in the Standard Long Range. Most other versions are rated at 330 miles. In the real-world Edmunds EV Range Test, the R2 Performance covered 304 miles, falling short of its 330-mile EPA estimate.

The Tesla Model Y outperforms the R2, ranging from 294 miles in the all-wheel-drive base model to 357 miles in the rear-wheel-drive Premium. The rear-wheel-drive base Model Y Edmunds tested covered 337 miles, and the new three-row Model Y L managed an impressive 358 miles — both beating their EPA estimates. For both rivals, all-wheel-drive versions are rated lower than their rear-wheel-drive counterparts.

Both electric SUVs use Tesla-style (NACS) charging ports, giving them access to Tesla’s vast Supercharger fast-charging network. Under ideal conditions, Tesla says the Model Y can add up to 162 miles in 15 minutes, edging out the R2’s cited 150 miles in 15 minutes. Edmunds’ testing confirmed that the Tesla charges slightly quicker.

Winner: Tesla Model Y

Rivian R2 vs. Tesla Model Y, an Edmunds electric SUV showdown
This photo provided by Edmunds shows the Tesla Model Y. This electric SUV offers a spacious interior, plenty of range, and advanced driving features that make long trips less tedious. Credit: Courtesy of Edmunds via AP

Tech features

The R2 and Model Y boast an impressive amount of standard tech, including a generous collection of advanced driver aids, wireless smartphone charging pads, large touchscreens with sharp-looking graphics, Google-based navigation, and camera systems that record your drive and monitor the vehicle’s surroundings when parked.

A hands-free driving mode is also available on both EVs. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (Supervised) drives hands-free on highways and city streets, obeying stop signs and traffic lights and changing lanes on its own — in Edmunds’ testing, it’s been the most useful hands-free driving system available. Rivian’s Autonomy+ also works hands-free on roads with painted lane markings, but it doesn’t operate during city driving.

Overall, however, the R2’s tech features are impressive. Unlike the Model Y, it has a digital driver display that keeps important info in your line of sight. Also, the R2’s touchscreen system proved more responsive and enjoyable to use in Edmunds’ testing.

Winner: Rivian R2

Interior comfort and utility

The Model Y rides more smoothly over bumps than the firmer R2, though both have comfortable, supportive seats. Passenger space is similar, though the R2 has a bit more rear headroom. Tesla one-ups Rivian, however, with an available third row in the Premium and in the extended-length Model Y L — though it’s best for kids and small adults, and it eats up a lot of cargo space when raised.

As for cargo, the R2 tops the Model Y behind the rear seats when you include their underfloor storage compartments, and it offers far greater total capacity: 90.1 cubic feet versus the five-seat Model Y’s 75.5 cubic feet. Its front trunk is slightly larger too, and its 4,400-pound max towing capacity tops the Model Y’s 3,500 pounds.

The Model Y is more comfortable and offers third-row versatility, but the R2 delivers more utility and a roomier back seat.

Winner: tie

Pricing and value

Including destination fees, the Rivian R2’s starting prices range from $46,485 for the Standard trim to $59,485 for the top-level Performance trim. The Model Y spans $41,380 for the base trim to $63,380 for the three-row Model Y L. Note that for the R2, only the priciest Performance trim is available now; more affordable trim levels arrive in late 2026 and spring 2027.

In general, the R2 will likely cost you a little more to buy. But it justifies its premium with a richer-looking interior, distinctive styling, superior off-road capability, and uncommon touches like a drop-down rear window and dual glove boxes. Rivian also backs it with a one-year/12,000-mile adjustment warranty covering wheel alignment, factory defects and more — something Tesla doesn’t offer.

Winner: tie

Edmunds says

This electric SUV comparison ends in a tie — both earned the same overall rating score and are at the top of Edmunds’ rankings for electric small SUVs. You can’t go wrong with either, but if range and comfort top your priorities, the Model Y is for you. If you’d rather have a more capable, premium-feeling SUV, order the R2.

Key concepts

Electric vehicle industry dynamics

Who’s behind this story?

Andrew Zinin

Andrew Zinin

Master’s in physics with research experience. Long-time science news enthusiast. Plays key role in Science X’s editorial success.

Full profile →

© 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

Citation:
Rivian R2 vs. Tesla Model Y: An electric SUV showdown (2026, September 23)
retrieved 24 September 2026
from https://techxplore.com/news/2026-09-rivian-r2-tesla-electric-suv.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Source: Tech Xplore

FBI investigates hackers' claim to have stolen sensitive employee data, compromised jobs website

FBI investigates hackers’ claim to have stolen sensitive employee data, compromised jobs website

Andrew Zinin

Chief Editor

FBI investigates apparent breach of its jobs website. Hackers claim to have sensitive employee data
An FBI seal is displayed on a podium before a news conference at the field office in Portland, Ore., Jan. 16, 2025. Credit: AP Photo/Jenny Kane, File

The FBI said Wednesday that it was investigating a criminal hacking group’s claims that it had stolen “very sensitive data” belonging to thousands of agents and applicants and that it had compromised the bureau’s jobs website.

“The FBI is aware of a cyber-criminal enterprise group claiming a compromise of the FBIJobs.gov portal and alleged impact to FBI employee personally identifiable information,” the FBI said in a statement. It said that while the “point of breach” was undetermined, “we are actively and aggressively investigating this matter and working closely with those third-party providers that support FBIJobs.gov to mitigate any and all risk.”

The jobs website, the main portal for prospective employees to learn about the FBI and initiate the application process, remained offline as of Wednesday afternoon.

A message that circulated online from a hacking group known as ShinyHunters claimed responsibility for the hack.

“We have compromised the FBI. We hold very sensitive data on almost ALL FBI Agents and individuals who filed an application with the FBI for a job,” said the ShinyHunters message, which was directed to FBI Director Kash Patel and Brett Leatherman, the assistant director in charge of the bureau’s cyber division.

The claims could not immediately be verified. An email to an address associated with ShinyHunters was not immediately returned.

FBI investigates apparent breach of its jobs website. Hackers claim to have sensitive employee data
FBI Director Kash Patel listens during the Senate Judiciary hearing on Oversight of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Tuesday, Sept. 15, 2026 in Washington. Credit: AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta

The hackers are seeking retribution over an FBI advisory

Miriam Wugmeister, a lawyer specializing in data, privacy and cybercrime who tracks hacking outfits like ShinyHunters, said that based on the group’s past practices, there was reason to believe the hackers’ claims, “so I think it’s likely that they were able to compromise this website and they got some data.”

She said that though the data that appeared to be compromised was the type of personal information that is routinely accessed during a breach, the hack nonetheless had alarming national security implications given that it could expose agents and their families to extortion, swatting and other harassment and because the identities of spouses were also said to have been obtained.

“Even if the agents and the analysts and the employees are sophisticated, you worry about their families too,” she said.

In its message, ShinyHunters said it would give the bureau one week to correct or remove what it said were false allegations contained in an FBI public advisory from May that described the organization as a “cyber criminal group specializing in large-scale data breaches and extortion.”

That advisory characterized ShinyHunters as “threat actors” who often “use their real or exaggerated claims of access to sensitive or personal information to prompt payment from victims,” commonly harass or threaten victims and “may falsely claim to have sensitive or compromising information, including embarrassing photographs or videos of victims, which frequently do not exist.”

ShinyHunters said in its message to the FBI that it was “offended” by those characterizations and demanded that the FBI remove those claims. It did not say what would happen if the FBI did not do so within a week.

“This is not a ransom, coercion, or extortion. Your federal policies do not apply here. This PSA is NOT financially motivated,” the hacking group’s message said.

ShinyHunters has a reputation for “causing trouble and being disruptive,” Wugmeister said, as evidenced by the group’s involvement in a hack last spring of Canvas, an online system used by thousands of schools and universities. The breach created chaos as students tried to study for finals and prompted the FBI’s advisory that ShinyHunters is now objecting to.

There have been other cyber incidents concerning the FBI

The hack was first reported by 404 Media, an online technology publication that said a representative of ShinyHunters shared what appeared to be a sample of personal data of 5,000 FBI employees, including addresses, phone numbers and some information on spouses.

The publication said the ShinyHunters representative said the group carried out the hack through an apparent vulnerability in Oracle PeopleSoft software, commonly used by companies and government agencies for large-scale data processing and human resources purposes. The FBI said in its statement that it had not determined whether the “point of breach” involved a “third-party or the FBI’s enterprise.”

The FBI, the nation’s premier federal law enforcement agency, has been a common target for hackers.

In March, the FBI disclosed that it was investigating “suspicious activities” on an internal system that contains sensitive information related to surveillance operations and investigations. Also that month, a pro-Iranian hacking group claimed to have hacked an account of Patel’s and posted online what appeared to be years-old photographs of him, along with a work resume and other personal documents dating back more than a decade.

The FBI described the compromised information as “historical in nature” and said it involved “no government information.”

Key concepts

Cybersecurity breaches

Who’s behind this story?

Andrew Zinin

Andrew Zinin

Master’s in physics with research experience. Long-time science news enthusiast. Plays key role in Science X’s editorial success.

Full profile →

© 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

Citation:
FBI investigates hackers’ claim to have stolen sensitive employee data, compromised jobs website (2026, September 23)
retrieved 24 September 2026
from https://techxplore.com/news/2026-09-fbi-apparent-breach-jobs-website.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Source: Tech Xplore

Tiny robot can precisely control its jump height

Tiny robot can precisely control its jump height

Lisa Lock

Scientific Editor

Robert Egan

Senior Editor

A small black and gold robot hops an inch off the ground.
DirectHop, a 1-gram hopping robot developed at the University of Washington, leaps off of a tabletop. Unlike more common spring-loaded hopping bots, DirectHop is powered directly by a tiny motor, allowing it to precisely vary its jump height. Credit: Mark Stone/University of Washington

As our skies increasingly crowd with buzzing, hovering, flitting drones, spare a thought for the humble hopping robot. Hopping, a popular form of locomotion in the insect and amphibian worlds, is nearly two orders of magnitude more energy-efficient than flying. Unlike a mosquito that must constantly expend energy to stay aloft, a flea only works out when it jumps.

Those cost savings could also pay off in the world of robotics: A group of small, simple hopping robots could explore a location much more cheaply than flying drones. These robots could find gas leaks in an oil refinery, monitor water and fertilizer usage on a farm, or even explore other planets.

With this in mind, engineers at the University of Washington have created DirectHop, a roughly 1-gram (0.04-ounce) robot that can perform multiple hops in sequence and jump high enough to clear a standard stair step. The robot uses a tiny electric motor and three folding legs to launch itself to a specified jump height with 1-centimeter (0.4-inch) accuracy. After it lands, DirectHop can twitch to right itself and then prepare for another jump.

The prototype, which fits in the palm of a hand, represents multiple steps on the path to an autonomous hopping robot that can traverse a variety of environments.

In this test hop, the motor moved slowly and only lifted the robot a few millimeters off the tabletop. Credit: Andre Quiles/University of Washington

“In my mind, the three hardest challenges for hopping robots are the ability to vary jump length, self-right and reload for multiple hops,” said senior author Sawyer Fuller, a UW associate professor of mechanical engineering. “DirectHop clears all three of those hurdles with a totally new design, and we’re well on our way to tackling other challenges like onboard power, steering and navigation.”

Fuller and his team will present a paper on DirectHop on Sept. 30 at the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2026).

Most hopping robots are modeled after insects like fleas that are literally spring-loaded. Fleas compress and then release parts of their exoskeletons to launch themselves to distances 50 times their own height. Robots that utilize springs and latches à la fleas can also travel impressive distances, but they have no easy way to calibrate jump distance—discharging a spring is an “all or nothing” action, said Fuller. What’s more, springs and latches are complex bits of machinery that are difficult to build and operate at small scales.

A researcher types on a laptop; a small robot nearby hops about a foot off of a tabletop.
Keo Hice, an undergraduate research assistant in Fuller’s lab, controls DirectHop with a nearby laptop. The current prototype requires external power and instructions, but the team is working on new iterations that will carry onboard power and navigate autonomously. Credit: Mark Stone/University of Washington

DirectHop’s solution to those problems is ditching the spring entirely.

“We found that a very small electric motor can accelerate fast enough to power a jump directly, the way a frog’s leg muscles directly power its hop,” said lead author Hanquan (John) Wang, a UW graduate research assistant in mechanical engineering. “We also discovered that by adjusting the current going to the motor, we could make the robot jump specific distances.”

The robot itself consists of a tiny electric motor attached to a tower by a length of fishing line. When the motor accelerates, it spools the line quickly and hoists itself up the tower, pulling the rest of the robot into the air. As the motor rises, three hinged legs extend to keep the motor aligned with the robot’s foot.

By quickly retracting its motor, DirectHop can right itself 90% of the time. Credit: Andre Quiles/University of Washington

Since the robot tends to tumble in the air, the researchers included a roll cage to support it when it lands on its side. From there, the team was able to right it 90% of the time by sending the motor back down the tower, which shifts the robot’s center of gravity and causes it to roll back onto its foot, readying it for another jump.

The design was inspired by box turtles, which can roll themselves upright using a similarly shaped shell.

The current prototype has some notable limitations. Power is supplied via wires, and it has no way to steer or orient itself beyond random twitching. Wang and Fuller, however, are working on solutions: onboard solar cells and a battery for power, a vibration motor to spin the robot in place, tiny retractable feet to adjust hop angle, and an onboard camera and electronics to navigate.

At full power, DirectHop can jump high enough to clear a standard stair step. Credit: Andre Quiles/University of Washington

“One of our goals is fully autonomous stair climbing,” Fuller said. “A camera looks at the stair, the processor figures out how high the robot has to jump, it steers itself into position, jumps, self-rights, steers again and repeats. It uses a combination of simple sensors and actions to perform a complex task.”

Wang thinks it’s reasonable to imagine producing a fully featured DirectHop bot for about $10 since the individual components are so small and cheap. At that price, the bots could be extremely useful as a semidisposable complement to larger, more capable, more expensive robots.

“We could dispatch 100 or even 1,000 of these robots into the field,” Wang said. “If some are lost or disabled, it’s not really a failure. The team of them can complete the task.”

More information

Paper: DirectHop: A Direct-Drive Insect-Sized Robot that can Control Jump Height and Self-Right

Key concepts

Bioinspired soft roboticsAutonomous robotic locomotion

Who’s behind this story?

Lisa Lock

Lisa Lock

BA art history, MA material culture. Former museum editor, paramedic, and transplant coordinator. Editing for Science X since 2021.

Full profile →


Robert Egan

Robert Egan

Bachelor’s in mathematical biology, Master’s in creative writing. Well-traveled with unique perspectives on science and language.

Full profile →

Citation:
Tiny robot can precisely control its jump height (2026, September 23)
retrieved 24 September 2026
from https://techxplore.com/news/2026-09-tiny-robot-precisely-height.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Source: Tech Xplore

Blockchain-inspired DNA storage codec recovers data from heavily damaged sequences

Blockchain-inspired DNA storage codec recovers data from heavily damaged sequences

Gaby Clark

Scientific Editor

Robert Egan

Senior Editor

HKU researchers develop blockchain-inspired Gungnir codec for long-term DNA data storage
Gungnir codec overview and its encoding algorithm. Credit: The University of Hong Kong

A research team at the Faculty of Engineering at The University of Hong Kong (HKU), led by professor Ruibang Luo of the School of Computing and Data Science and professor Can Li of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, has developed Gungnir, a blockchain-inspired DNA data storage codec. The framework improves digital information recovery from severely damaged DNA sequences, potentially extending the practical lifespan of DNA data archives from less than a decade to centuries. The paper is published in the journal Nature Communications.

DNA is a promising medium for long-term archival storage. It can hold vast amounts of information in a small physical volume, remain stable for millennia under suitable conditions and require no energy during storage. However, DNA molecules can gradually degrade and accumulate damage over time, making the original files increasingly difficult to recover. Existing codecs work best with newly synthesized DNA. They are less effective at correcting errors that build up during long-term storage.

Gungnir takes a new approach to error correction by applying blockchain-based computing techniques to DNA data storage. It uses substantial computing power to generate possible reconstructions of the original data and verify them until it identifies the correct information. In other words, greater computing power gives Gungnir stronger error correction capabilities. The design enables a DNA drive to tolerate error rates of up to 20%, a fourfold improvement over existing methods.

HKU researchers develop blockchain-inspired Gungnir codec for long-term DNA data storage
Error tolerance performance of Gungnir. Credit: The University of Hong Kong

The technique makes it possible to recover data even from heavily damaged DNA. In extreme testing, Gungnir achieved lossless data recovery from DNA with damage levels expected after around 400 years of archival storage. This could extend the practical lifespan of a DNA drive from less than a decade to several centuries. As computing power grows, Gungnir’s performance could improve, potentially making it possible to preserve digital information in DNA for millennia.

Gungnir is open source and available at https://github.com/HKU-BAL/Gungnir.

Publication details

Jingcheng Zhang et al, Gungnir codec enabling high error-tolerance and low-redundancy DNA storage through substantial computing power, Nature Communications (2026). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-026-71485-x

Journal information:
Nature Communications

Who’s behind this story?

Gaby Clark

Gaby Clark

MA in English, copy editor since 2021 with experience in higher education and health content. Dedicated to trustworthy science news.

Full profile →


Robert Egan

Robert Egan

Bachelor’s in mathematical biology, Master’s in creative writing. Well-traveled with unique perspectives on science and language.

Full profile →

Citation:
Blockchain-inspired DNA storage codec recovers data from heavily damaged sequences (2026, September 23)
retrieved 24 September 2026
from https://techxplore.com/news/2026-09-blockchain-dna-storage-codec-recovers.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Source: Tech Xplore

Latest Posts