Preloader

Community

Presenting the Winners of the AcrylicWorks 13: Best of Acrylic Competition

✓Showcase your talent and win big in Artists Network prestigious art competitions! Discover competitions in a variety of media and enter for your chance to win cash prizes, publication in leading art magazines, global exposure, and rewards for your hard work. Plus, gain valuable feedback from renowned jurors. Let your passion shine through – enter an art competition today!

The annual AcrylicWorks: Best of Acrylic competition has been celebrating incredible skill and talent in the medium of acrylic for more than a decade. We’re grateful to Juror of Awards Marc Hanson and the many luminaries who have served as jurors over the years, as well as the thousands of artists who have participated. Together, we’ve created a prestigious, highly anticipated showcase that not only applauds artistic excellence but also celebrates a thriving acrylic community that just keeps getting stronger. We’re delighted to reveal the top three prizewinners of this year’s competition, and share Hanson’s insights on what made these works stand out. 

First Place:
Moonlight on the Robe (acrylic on canvas, 36×24)
by Xiaopeng Liu 

“I found this painting to be beautifully and competently painted in every regard. More than that, I had an emotional response at first viewing that never left me as I continued to consider it, and all the other paintings. The beauty of the paint surface, the use of a specific color scheme for effect and a masterful rendering of the figure all combine to make a very powerful image––one that I’m thrilled to be able to award with a first-place accolade.” ––Marc Hanson, Juror 

Second Place:
Snapdragons (acrylic on canvas, 60×48)
by Paul Vollman 

“This is an outstanding example of a powerful, but sensitive, use of the acrylic medium. The artist did a wonderful job of applying the academic principles of painting to the composition. I was also impressed by how beautifully he used the complements of red and green in various mixtures––two colors that, in combination, can be a nightmare to handle––to create such a soothing painting.”  ––Marc Hanson, Juror 

Third Place:
Walk of Adoration (acrylic and ink on canvas, 30×48)
by Jennifer Sowders

“The artist who painted this piece has been in this woodland, and it shows. I was amazed that the work has a lot of rendering, but it’s done so well. And I was surprised by how accurate it is without being overdone. It’s a beautiful example of using acrylic in a bold-yet-delicate way—and it’s outstanding.” ––Marc Hanson, Juror 

About the Juror

Marc Hanson majored in illustration at the Art Center College of Design, in Pasadena, Calif., before moving to Minnesota, where he lived for 33 years while raising a family and pursuing his career as a professional artist. He currently lives near Savannah, Ga., on Tybee Island, with his partner—fellow painter, Dottie T. Leatherwood—and their three dogs. His paintings, which have received numerous awards, have been shown in galleries and museums nationally and internationally for more than 40 years.

*The Best of Acrylic: Winners of the AcrylicWorks 13 Competition  special issue hits newsstands today! Print and digital issues are available for purchase at Artists Network.


From Our Shop



Source: Artists Network

The Art of Picture-Making

Take on complex, multi-figure compositions with California artist Warren Chang’s step-by-step demo! Learn how Chang combines multiple photo reference into a harmonious scene, establishes depth through a tonal underpainting, and a practical framework for organizing figures to create compelling narratives!


Source: Artists Network

Drawing the Third Dimension

✓Showcase your talent and win big in Artists Network prestigious art competitions! Discover competitions in a variety of media and enter for your chance to win cash prizes, publication in leading art magazines, global exposure, and rewards for your hard work. Plus, gain valuable feedback from renowned jurors. Let your passion shine through – enter an art competition today!

By John Roman

If there’s one word in an artist’s vocabulary that’s most likely to induce panic, it’s this one: perspective. Not to worry, though. In this illustrated guide, you can learn the basics of linear perspective with visual aids—and even poetic rhymes—to help you keep the information fresh in your mind and ready to put into practice.

The Drawing the Third Dimension Guide is a free verse, end-rhyming poem that describes the technical terms of Linear Perspective with accompanying illustrations to clarify each definition. In the days prior to the printed word, lessons were learned by setting them to rhyme. With that in mind, I created this guide to be read, re-read, absorbed, and practiced over the entire course of one’s artistic journey. Download it here. Print it out. Put a copy above your art table where you can reference it as often as you need to.

And, if you’d like to dig even deeper into the topic of perspective, check out these additional articles I’ve written about the history, the workings and the power of perspective:

Make a Point with the Vanishing Point
The 1-2-3’s of Linear Perspective

About the Artist

John Roman is an award-winning illustrator and the author of The Art of Illustrated Maps: A Complete Guide to Creative Mapmaking’s History, Process and Inspiration (HOW Books). He has taught illustration and perspective drawing at Boston’s Massachusetts College of Art and Design since 1993.


From Our Shop



Source: Artists Network

Showstoppers: Jimmy Wright

✓Showcase your talent and win big in Artists Network prestigious art competitions! Discover competitions in a variety of media and enter for your chance to win cash prizes, publication in leading art magazines, global exposure, and rewards for your hard work. Plus, gain valuable feedback from renowned jurors. Let your passion shine through – enter an art competition today!

An exhibition of the artist’s emotionally charged floral paintings goes on view, in London, for the month of September.

By Anne Hevener

Sun and Shadow (1999–2001; oil on canvas, 96×72)

The celebration of the work of American artist Jimmy Wright is hopping the pond this month with a 5-week exhibition at Thomas Dane Gallery, in London, in collaboration with Chicago gallery, Corbett vs. Dempsey. Entitled “After the War,” the London show will feature the artist’s flower paintings, made in oil and pastel, from 1992 onwards. 

Born in Union City, Tenn., in 1944, Wright grew up in rural Kentucky. As a young man, he moved first to Chicago, where he studied at The Art Institute of Chicago, and then moved to New York City in 1974, where he has lived since. It was when his partner, Ken Nuzzo, was diagnosed with AIDS, in 1988, that Wright began his paintings of flowers, infusing the traditional still life subject with an emotional vitality that communicated feelings of pain, grief and the enduring power of love. Characterized by thick applications of paint and an underlayer of acrylic modeling paste that creates a sculptural quality, Wright’s initial series of works, called “Flowers for Ken,” launched what would be a lasting creative inquiry. The Thomas Dane Gallery writes that the artwork being shown in the “After the War” exhibition, “can be seen as portraits of the artistic community lost to the pandemic.” 

An Inside Look at Sun and Shadow

Wright’s story of the making and meaning of the piece, Sun and Shadow (seen above; 1999–2001; oil on canvas, 96×72), a monumentally sized piece that the artist worked on for more than three years, describes the hidden tension behind bold, powerful floral imagery and the fragility they represent:

“I had completed a series of flower-basket paintings as diptychs—familial twin baskets of flowers that could be installed either as a single painting in two parts, averaging 12 feet in length, or as two individual, 6-foot paintings that communicated across a room or wall,” he says. “The Shadow is the top basket of cool blue sunflowers—a heavy, overbearing storm cloud passing over the lower basket of warm, sunlit sunflowers, The Sun, which formally pushes forward in the pictorial space. A silver slice of white light on the left side of the composition acts like the lever on a slot machine, propelling the heavy, cool basket forward in an endless, visually dynamic struggle of opposing forces on a flat canvas.

“I call my flower paintings ‘Trojan Horses,’ because—while they masquerade as appealing, seductive still lifes of flowers—they are memento mori representations of nature that explore themes of loss, survival and memory, serving as monuments to the fragility of life and beauty.”

“After the War” is on view from September 4 to October 1, 2026, at Thomas Dane Gallery, 11 Duke Street, St James’s, London SW1. 

To learn more about the artist, Jimmy Wright, visit jimmywrightartist.com.

Works on Paper 

In an article for Pastel Journal (February 2019), Wright advised artists not to let technique overpower the art. “Many artists put the cart before the horse,” he said. “And they apply technique with such rigidity that it suffocates the art. Technique has to come out of the search for art.” Here are some additional examples of works by the artist, created in pastel, that demonstrate putting the expression at the forefront.

Moth to Flames (pastel on paper, 30×20)
Red Pompeii, No. 4 (pastel on paper, 29½x22½)
Gather Together, No. 1 (pastel on paper, 41×29)
Sunflower Moon (pastel on paper, 29×27)


From Our Shop



Source: Artists Network

A College Girl Was Exploited on Camera. A Network of Anonymous Men Got to Work

Content warning: This piece includes descriptions of nonconsensual sex and intimate image abuse.

I

On the afternoon of Sunday, November 2, 2025, Maddie Kowalski stopped by a house in Gainesville to drop off a present. The University of Florida sophomore had traveled to Japan that summer, where she’d picked up an action figure from the manga One Piece as a gift.

Students referred to this building near the main campus, which has long been associated with the UF chapter of the frat Phi Delta Theta, as “Fort.” A brick multifamily colonial-style house, it was a typical frat-boy residence with worn hardwood floors, exposed cables, and “THIS IS FORT” spray-painted in UF’s orange and blue colors on the fence lining the perimeter. Phi Delta Theta didn’t have a great reputation on campus; at the time, they were being investigated for accusations of hazing. But the boys who lived there were Kowalski’s best friends: “It was a safe space, I thought.”

A few hours later, Kowalski, then 19, was at an apartment drinking when a friend told her something that would alter the trajectory of her life: Did she know that a nude image of her was circulating at FSU, a university a few hours away?

Kowalski would later learn that the image was making the rounds on Snapchat, and people were talking about it on the anonymous campus social network YikYak. When she opened the app, “that’s when I started crashing out,” she says. As Kowalski scrolled, she saw what appeared to be hundreds of messages about a “DZ” girl. (She was in the sorority Delta Zeta.) They were now referring to not just an image, but a video. Some were joking about masturbating to it.

The situation was about to get worse. Around 6 that night, an anonymous account on X with the handle @SteveCumfull posted the video, saying: “Meet Maddie Kowalski, queen of Delta Zeta.” Kowalski had no idea who the poster was, but she immediately identified the setting in one shot as Fort. In the video, the floor is dirty, with debris strewn everywhere. She’s lying on the ground naked, her eyes half-closed, touching herself while flanked by a group of men in shorts. While their faces weren’t visible, they appeared to be some of the same guys she’d been hanging out with just a few hours prior, she realized with a sinking feeling in her gut. In another shot, from a different night and at a different location, she is being penetrated by two men.

The video that ended up going viral on X was a compilation of three different clips: one, mentioned above, that was taken at Fort earlier that fall, and two that were recorded during a separate sexual encounter with two strangers. Kowalski says she met the latter in October, not long before the video went viral, when she was walking home after a night out drinking. She was heavily intoxicated and only remembers “parts of” what happened: “I didn’t recognize myself at all.” She says she did not consent to being filmed, let alone have that content shared publicly.

What had been a piece of salacious on-campus gossip, transmitted via anonymous social media and group texts, was now a national story. X removed the post containing the video, but late the following day, @SteveCumfull posted it again. Then they posted a screenshot of a cryptocurrency token they’d bought with Kowalski’s name on it, with a market cap of $11,400. “Put your children’s college savings into this,” they tweeted. @SteveCumfull could have been anyone: a close friend, a neighbor, a mutual with an axe to grind. Whoever they were, they now appeared to be profiting from the worst moment of Kowalski’s life.

Over the next 24 hours, Kowalski sat paralyzed on her couch as anonymous people on the internet endlessly harassed her; they posted her old photos, her dad’s LinkedIn, and even his golf handicap. They called and texted her parents all through the night, saying things like, “I gave your daughter drugs and fucked her”; one anonymous man told Kowalski’s father he’d had sex with her and had since tested positive for HIV while playing the call live on Spaces, X’s live chat feature. Another posted on X placing bets on whether, by the end of the coming week, she’d start an OnlyFans or kill herself.

A mobile phone.

The burnerverse has harassed Kowalski and her family for nearly a year, sometimes encouraging her to commit suicide.

Photograph: Natalie Keyssar

Kowalski called her best friend, Lexie Blake, who was then a sophomore at the University of Mississippi. She “wasn’t even really saying words,” Blake recounts. “She was just sobbing, hysterical.” When Kowalski’s father showed up at her apartment, she was too humiliated to face him. She tried to jump out of her fifth-floor window.

By Monday afternoon, #Maddiekowalski was trending on X nationwide, with more than 1,200 posts using the hashtag. Content about her—much of it showing her incapacitated, naked, and engaging in sex acts—had been viewed more than 8.5 million times.

Kowalski had heard about this happening to other college girls before; one of them, a University of Mississippi (Ole Miss) student named Mary Kate Cornett, had been doxed in the same way nine months prior. These campaigns were the work of the burnerverse (or “beev,” or “BV”), a loosely connected network of anonymous “burner” accounts on X, mostly operated by students and alumni, with the primary purpose of discussing college sports.

But Kowalski was learning in real time that, outside of talking shit about athletes and posting photos of crushed red Solo cups, this faceless corner of the internet has another mission: destroying the lives of young women.

II

Kowalski is tall and slender, with blue eyes and natural red roots that peek out of her dyed hair, which is sometimes brown and sometimes blonde—her “Neapolitan thing.” Like most 20-year-olds, she’s effortlessly deadpan, gushing about the TV show Dance Moms and skewering Miami club culture (“nobody there has a job … and it’s like, I’m not willing to talk to old men for a Birkin.”)

But in many ways, she seems younger than 20 when I visit her family’s house, located in a Florida suburb where preternaturally tanned kids drive golf carts on the sidewalks. She sits on the couch next to her family’s 12-year-old dog Bailey, her knees drawn up to her chest under a pink Lilly Pulitzer blanket. Often, she deflects when the conversation veers toward what happened last November, scrolling through her phone or abruptly commenting on her false lashes, or her spray tan, or her dog’s farts.

“If I’m fidgeting or looking at my phone, it’s because this whole thing obviously makes me uncomfortable to talk about,” she says, speaking to a mainstream news outlet for the first time. “There’s a lot of emotions underneath the surface. But I am trying not to be upset.”

Her hesitation is understandable: The women targeted by the burnerverse were private citizens before their names, rumors, explicit images, or videos went viral. WIRED has identified 10 women who have been doxed by the burnerverse, most of whom were between the ages of 18 and 21. The virality follows a specific pattern: salacious gossip about a college girl’s sex life, or nude photos and videos of her, make their way to YikYak or Snapchat before being disseminated by burner accounts on public social media platforms. Sometimes, the content has even made national news, with aggregation websites like TheSportsGrail or Barstool Sports employees amplifying the victim’s humiliation.

Communities of burner accounts crop up around most large schools with prominent sports teams. Networks of a Big 10 university, like Michigan State or the University of Maryland, will have a slightly different flavor than that of an LSU or an Ole Miss, which are part of the Southeastern Conference. Kowalski’s video went viral within the SEC burnerverse before spreading nationally.

Like most online communities, the SEC burnerverse has its own vernacular, consisting of allusions to frat boy culture. The men’s designer Peter Millar, known for his preppy collared shirts and chinos, is often referenced; as are Zyn, various SEC football coaches, “bouse” and “touse” (shorthand for a “top” or “bottom”), and “bag” (cocaine). Some take advantage of their anonymity to post racist, homophobic, and antisemitic comments.

A woman looking through a ring light.

Kowalski quit her part-time gig as a bottle girl and server after the burnerverse harassed her employer. Her main source of income is now TikTok Live, where she “battles”—essentially, competes for tips—with other creators.

Photograph: Natalie Keyssar

The ecosystem is sprawling and diverse. Many, if not most, sports burner accounts are fairly innocuous, congregating in X Spaces or group DMs to post memes about new recruits or competing teams. Some will even try to rein in the unrulier factions by denouncing them, arguing that they’re a poor representation of the team’s fandom, says Owen McCarthy, a recent graduate of Michigan State University who reported on MSU’s burnerverse. “To a certain extent there’s an awareness that it might behoove them to create a positive online environment” for the school, he says.

Like most online communities, burners adhere to a hierarchy, with some accounts amassing more clout based on their follower count or a particularly viral tweet. The men’s ages range widely. One burner fan account for an East Coast university team tells WIRED that in his group DM of around 200 people, there are members as young as 15 and as old as their mid-forties. There’s also some level of engagement between the burners and college athletics departments: Users often tag coaches or athletes to try to get their attention, and sometimes the more influential accounts will instruct people to “comment on potential recruits’ online stuff and tell them how great [the school] is,” the burner says.

There’s also evidence that some college sports athletics departments are aware of the burners and even maintain cordial, semi-symbiotic relationships with them, akin to the dynamic between a brand and an influencer account. According to McCarthy’s piece, one prominent MSU burner account alleged that the school invited burners to an event unveiling the football team’s new alternate uniforms. Athletics staffers would even send him photos of meetings with potential recruits: “It was like, ‘Wink, wink, nod, nod, if you want to post these pictures, feel free to do so,’” they said in the report. (A top official at MSU told McCarthy that this was not “part of athletic department strategies.”)

Many burners are run by school alumni or casual fans, but a non-negligible number of them are associated with fraternities, as evidenced by the photos of Greek events they post or the affiliation in their bios. Blake, who is involved in Greek life at Ole Miss, says it’s an open secret on campus that potential new members are strongly encouraged to create burner accounts in order to pledge. (Ole Miss did not respond to a request for comment.) These are “guys who would buy you a drink, who’d take you out on a date, who are your little brothers or your best friend or your boyfriend,” she says. “It could literally be anybody. It’s not mean or troubled guys doing it, or guys who need validation. It’s guys with wealthy families and support systems and college educations.”

For many of these accounts, the ultimate objective is going viral, through whatever means necessary. “They want to see something go viral that they created, and they say things like, ‘The burnerverse has made it big time,’” one person with a burner account, who asked not to be identified, tells WIRED. “They take pride in that in a twisted way. Getting their stuff on Barstool and ESPN is the goal.”

Sometimes, this involves scouring their school’s incoming students’ Instagrams and posting photos of young women for the purpose of mocking or humiliating them. But the most surefire way to go viral is to dox stereotypically attractive young women like Kowalski—even better if they’ve transgressed sexual norms in some way. There’s a sense that the health and vibrancy of the community is contingent on the sexual humiliation of women. “Feels like the beev is slowly dying,” one tweet from this past May reads. “We need another college girl to get exposed for a revival.” Another: “Feels like a national holiday every time a new whore gets exposed on the BV.”

A tweet.

In less than 24 hours, #Maddiekowalski was trending on X nationwide, with more than 1,200 posts using the hashtag. Content about her—much of it showing her incapacitated, naked, and engaging in sex acts—would be viewed more than 8.5 million times.

The most well-known case is Mary Kate Cornett, a then 18-year-old University of Mississippi student who went viral in February 2025, after an X user with the handle @thekendallroy tweeted, “Anyone else hearing rumblings of this Ole Miss girl banging her boyfriend’s Dad?” The rumor was false, but @thekendallroy’s post exploded, racking up 313,000 views in just under two days. It didn’t take long for other burners to post her full name.

Prior to being doxed, Cornett tells WIRED she was largely unaware of the burnerverse. “It’s like they have this blueprint for what to do every time they decide to destroy a girl’s life,” she says. “That excites them, for some odd reason.” Cornett became a top trending topic on X, thanks to the story being boosted by former NFL player Antonio Brown and the prominent ESPN talking head Pat McAfee, a former Barstool personality. McAfee repeated the rumor on a special taping of his talk show—without naming Cornett, though he did name her sorority—and then posted that clip to his YouTube channel, which has nearly 3 million followers.

Four months after spreading the false rumor on his show, McAfee apologized and deleted a tweet featuring the clip of him talking about it; the video itself, however, is still up on his YouTube channel. (Neither Barstool nor McAfee responded to a request for comment, and ESPN declined.) But the damage had been done: Cornett was barraged by thousands of harassing texts, calls, and voicemails; a SWAT team was even sent to her mother’s house the day after McAfee’s show. She has spent the past year and a half working with lawyers and forensic experts to identify burner accounts. “There’s very little accountability,” says Cornett’s mother, Leslie. “You can lie online and do whatever you want. Then your life moves on, and [the girls’ lives] stop.”

A man speaking into a microphone.

The most well known victim of the burnerverse is Mary Kate Cornett, a University of Mississippi student who went viral for a false rumor about her sex life. The hearsay was boosted by ESPN talking head Pat McAfee, who spoke about it on a special taping of his talk show.

Photograph: Sean Gardner/Getty Images

The BV “whoreverse,” as some burner accounts call it, started to coalesce in June 2024, when an account named Arthur Cacciatore posted the name of an undergrad at a large Southern state school, who was falsely rumored to have slept “with like 35% of the SEC.” The girl’s name became a trending topic on X, with Barstool Sports writer Jack Mac amplifying it to his 146,000 followers; the post got 815,000 views. (Due to the traumatizing nature of the burnerverse’s campaigns against these women, WIRED is withholding their names and altering details to protect their anonymity, unless they’ve gone public with their experiences, like Cornett and Kowalski.)

From there, the burnerverse started systemically seeking out young, attractive college women to shame on a national stage. These women attend colleges across the country, ranging from the Big 10 to the Atlantic Coast Conference; some have had pornographic images and videos of them posted without their consent, while others have gone viral simply for unverifiable rumors about their sex lives. Whoever the victim, whatever the details of the campaign, the treatment is relentless, and unsparing.

The burnerverse efforts are often highly organized, says Adam Ludwin, Kowalski’s attorney, who specializes in cyberharassment. “When you look at some of these cases, things escalate so much more rapidly than the other types of cases that I’ve dealt with,” he says. “The volume of views and reposts and comments—it’s not the kind of thing that would happen in such a short time without some level of coordination.”

In Kowalski’s case, coordination appears to have taken place on X Spaces, the platform’s live audio-based conversation feature. One of the earliest X posts about her, for instance, features a screengrab from one such Space: “Kowalski Analysis” (a reference to a character from the 2014 film Penguins of Madagascar). Though no public recordings exist, a screengrab shows that at one point, more than 220 X users were participating in a discussion of Kowalski’s nonconsensual intimate images (NCII) under the veil of anonymity.

It doesn’t help that X, the burnerverse’s platform of choice, is famously subject to little moderation. Since Elon Musk acquired the social network in 2022, its algorithm has regularly boosted racist, misogynistic, and antisemitic content, making it the ideal petri dish for a coordinated harassment campaign. On X, it’s extremely easy for defamatory or outright illegal content, such as Kowalski’s NCII, to spread far and wide before someone can issue a complaint or file a takedown request. “The platforms tend to be pretty hands-off,” says Ludwin. “They’re also financially incentivized by followers, by views, by clicks … they’re making money off this.” (X did not respond to WIRED’s request for comment.)

Most burnerverse victims remain silent following their harassment, hoping for the uproar to blow over. The majority did not respond to requests for an interview, or declined to go on the record. They’ve spent thousands of dollars, if not hundreds of thousands, on legal fees, therapy, and reputation management firms. “We are unfortunately navigating something that I wouldn’t wish on my worst enemy,” one father of a victim tells me anonymously. “I just don’t think she’s ready at this time.”

Even months or years after they go viral, the victim’s NCII are still widely available on leaked amateur porn sites; their names, linked to graphic and defamatory rumors, are eminently googleable, their faces edited over those of dead presidents to make memes with names like “Mount Rushwhore.” Cornett says the burnerverse continues to post about her on a near-daily basis, taking screenshots of her Instagram posts and making memes. Now 20 and in her junior year, she’s still hounded whenever she goes out on campus, and she lives in fear of someone taking a photo of her and posting it online. “It’s a terrible feeling to never not feel like you’re being watched or observed or talked about,” she says. “I read every single post, every single comment, every hashtag. It consumes my whole life.”

III

Maddie Kowalski has always felt like an outsider. She was adopted at birth and her family moved around a lot; when she was 7, her father was diagnosed with stage-four cancer, which caused her to act out in school. “There was a lot going on at home, and I didn’t have a lot of friends,” she says. “I would play alone during recess. I was definitely a weird kid.”

At the start of middle school, Kowalski’s family relocated to an affluent Floridian suburb. She disliked it almost immediately: “All the kids are beach kids whose parents are old money,” she says. “And they think you’re poor if you don’t live in a $20 million house.”

After Covid, she became heavily involved with theater, appearing in her high school’s productions of Kiss Me, Kate and High School Musical. But she struggled to adjust socially. “She was definitely sheltered,” Blake says. “She didn’t drink or go out very much, and she’d get grounded if she had a drink. She was very straight-laced, and that was probably seen as a little weird or awkward at the time.”

Kowalski worshipped the cool older girls at her school with their “little Pinteresty Instagrams,” most of whom ended up in Greek life at UF. When it came time to apply to college, UF was one of her top choices. “I was like, ‘I wanna join a sorority and wear a cute blue and orange outfit.’”

Like most SEC schools, UF has a strong focus on Greek life: Frats and sororities are the hubs of campus culture, with approximately 21 percent of the 41,000 undergraduate student population rushing. Kowalski loathed rush: She hated traipsing from house to house in high heels, her makeup sweating off in the Florida humidity. But she didn’t want to be like the “weird” kids who hunkered down in their dorm rooms or the library all day. She accepted a bid from the sorority Delta Zeta, which has a reputation for being “proper,” one student tells me; it’s a stereotypical SEC sorority, where members attend tailgates in cowboy boots and flouncy minidresses.

At first, Kowalski’s college experience was typical. She majored in theater, worked part-time as a server and bottle girl, and volunteered at a camp for kids whose parents had cancer. But Blake says Kowalski had a “strong need to fit in” and seemingly wanted to prove she wasn’t still a sheltered theater kid. “I think it was probably a little intimidating for her to go to college with so many people who’d gone to our high school and already had a preconceived notion of her,” she says.

Kowalski became deeply immersed in the party scene, going out to bars every night and sometimes drinking heavily. The bar-hopping took a tremendous toll on her mental health; her grades started plummeting, prompting her to temporarily withdraw from classes in late October, shortly before the burnerverse targeted her. “I was so inebriated I had absolutely no idea what was going on. I barely remembered my own birthday,” she says. Of that particular period of her life: “I was making bad decisions. And I trusted the wrong people.”

IV

For Kowalski, the weeks following the leak were hell. Students shouted slurs as she walked to class; one even threw an egg at her. Kowalski says many of her Delta Zeta sisters blocked or unfollowed her on social media. She alleges that the sorority held a chapter meeting where they discussed how the incident would reflect on the organization—rather than talking about her welfare. (Delta Zeta did not respond to a request for comment.)

“A lot of people were sad for what happened, because it shouldn’t have been filmed and posted,” one UF student tells me. “But there’s obviously people who are blaming her and saying she was doing these things for drugs or that she was crazy.”

Almost immediately after the video leaked, Kowalski reported the harassment to campus police. They assured her they would launch an investigation, then handed it off to the Gainesville Police Department. She says UF administrators also promised to launch an investigation into how the content spread. According to Kowalski, though, they told her that unless the police filed charges, the administration couldn’t take any action against students.

A Title IX investigation was dropped after about a month because, she says UF told her, the video had technically been filmed off campus. UF assistant director of public affairs Blake Trauschke declined to comment on the Title IX investigation, except to say, “UF is committed to creating a sense of belonging and safety by fostering an environment that is safe, secure, and free from all forms of harassment.”

A hand holding sand.

Kowalski searches for shark’s teeth at a beach she used to frequent when she was a child.

Photograph: Natalie Keyssar

The Kowalskis say they have spent tens of thousands on reputation management and legal fees, hiring a lawyer almost immediately after the video was posted as well as a company to help scrub the illegal content from the internet. Kowalski’s mother, Mandy, says it was surprisingly difficult to find a lawyer to take on the case. “I think people assumed it was just a simple revenge porn case,” she says. “They didn’t understand the scope of it.” Over and over, she says, the family was told that going after the men behind the video’s spread would cost more time and money than it was worth.

There were also multiple accusations at hand, making it hard to focus. Should the family go after the men who had sex with a clearly intoxicated woman? Whoever shot the video? The people who’d shared it in private group chats? Or the burner accounts who made Kowalski’s humiliation a national news story? Real harm had been done to Kowalski, and her family, but identifying who was most culpable was nearly impossible.

Kowalski wasn’t thinking about legal ramifications at the time. To her, the implied message—from the burners, some school administrators, her sorority sisters—was clear: What happened to her was her problem, and her problem alone. The harassing phone calls to her parents, the on-campus bullying, the fact that she had been filmed having sex without her consent in the first place: No one was going to face the consequences but her.

“Nobody fucking cares,” she says, summarizing the past 10 months. “You can do literally whatever you want [even] if it’s illegal, except for literally kill someone. No one gives a fuck.”

V

By last December, Kowalski had officially withdrawn from the semester’s classes at the University of Florida and moved back in with her parents. Soon after, her hair started falling out. Mysterious rashes showed up all over her face. She started doing intensive outpatient therapy and was eventually diagnosed with PTSD. “There’s only so much therapy can help,” she says. “Maybe it will, long-term. But not now.”

Nonetheless, Kowalski felt compelled to say something, against the advice of some in her family, who worried that a public statement would reinvigorate the harassment. “I just didn’t think it was fair,” she tells me. “Everyone else was making videos about me, and I couldn’t make one or say anything for myself.”

On December 19, she tied her newly dyed blonde hair back into a ponytail, took a deep breath, and decided to introduce herself on Instagram: “Hi, my name is Maddie Kowalski, and you may or may not know me personally, but you may have heard a little bit about me over the past month,” she said, staring directly into the camera.

Wearing a simple gray tee, small hoops, and a gold-plated bow-tie necklace, Kowalski explained what happened, how “several videos from two nights that I could barely remember had been posted on the internet for everyone to see.” She described in detail how she had not consented to the acts in the video, nor to them being filmed; how she and her parents had been relentlessly harassed; how she, in the span of just a few weeks, had felt her “whole world collapse.”

“These last few weeks have been the darkest and hardest moments of my life,” she said in the video, before directing fellow victims of NCII toward a website for legal resources. “But I’m still here, and that’s something that I’m really learning to be proud of.”

A woman sitting on a bed.

By last December, she’d officially withdrawn from the semester’s classes at the University of Florida and moved back in with her parents.

Photograph: Natalie Keyssar

The video got tens of millions of views, as well as many positive comments from people expressing support and applauding Maddie for her courage. But her parents’ fears were also well founded: For every encouraging comment, there was one from a burner making crude jokes or propositioning her for sex. The backlash surprised Kowalski. “I’d said everything I wanted to say, and I thought I said it in a way that was appropriate,” she says. “But I still got so much hate.”

VI

Who would want to ruin my life?

It was the main question Kowalski asked herself as she began to process what had happened to her. She had a vague understanding of how the video had circulated on campus among group texts and fraternity DMs. But she didn’t know who @SteveCumfull was, how they got the video, or why they would have publicly posted it on X.

Working with Ludwin, her attorney, Kowalski decided not to pursue charges against the men in the video. Relitigating the events would be retraumatizing. Instead, they wanted to identify the burners. The Gainesville police would eventually file a legal request to X for the subscriber information, IP records, and account information of not just @SteveCumfull but also a few other accounts that were early sharers of the video. (A representative for the Gainesville Police Department declined to comment, saying the case was still “open and active.”) For the burners, “there is a false sense of security when it comes to anonymity,” Ludwin tells me. “And one thing I want to do is reassure victims that just because [the burners] are hidden doesn’t mean we can’t find them.”

Kowalski had assumed that the burner accounts sharing her video were UF students—people she knew personally. From what she learned through police charging documents, she was half right. According to affidavits obtained by WIRED, the @SteveCumfull account was allegedly linked to a 19-year-old named Kamran Ahmed, a first-year UF student from Tampa who was a member of Theta Chi. Kowalski says she had never met Ahmed and had no idea who he was.

Per the police affidavits, the same went for another burner that had been among the first to post the video on X:
@arnie_grape16 was linked to UF freshman Brendan Pitfield, a former star high school soccer player from Atlanta and fellow Theta Chi. Police also identified a third person behind a burner: Jacob Gomberg, a junior from nearby Coral Springs. Gomberg was a relief pitcher for the UF Gators, a Division I baseball team, before transferring to UNLV and later Indiana University. Kowalski didn’t know them either.

It’s not clear how these men allegedly obtained the sexually explicit content, but there is evidence to suggest that two may have known each other. Kowalski’s father, who has been tirelessly collecting evidence, shares a screenshot of an interaction between two Instagram accounts that appear to be linked to both Pitfield and Ahmed, respectively. One commented “SC” (which Kowalski believes is short for Steve Cumfull”) on a November 3 post by the other. (In early September, Ahmed’s Instagram was briefly deleted; it has since been reinstated but is private.) Kowalski says she saw both Pitfield and Ahmed at a bar in the spring. Ahmed looked at her and laughed, Kowalski says, while Pitfield approached her and said: I’m a huge fan, can I get a picture with you?

In December, Kowalski emailed UF’s Office of Sorority and Fraternity Life to make sure they were aware that she was a victim in an ongoing criminal investigation and that it allegedly involved fraternity members. Their response referred her to the Office of Student Conduct, saying it did not “oversee the organizational or individual conduct processes” regarding fraternity members. Trauschke’s department, which represents the offices of Student Conduct and Sorority and Fraternity Life, did not address WIRED’s specific requests for comment for either agency.

Kowalski says most of the people involved in the video are still on campus. The spokesperson for Phi Delta Theta could not confirm if this includes any of its members, saying that due to university confidentiality policies surrounding Title IX investigations, it had “not been made aware of the names of any individuals ever affiliated with our organization who are accused of these heinous acts.”

Around the time that Kowalski’s video went viral, Phi Delta Theta was suspended until at least 2030 following the culmination of the hazing investigation. The UF chapter is being reconstituted with a new advisory board and will continue to operate independently of the university. According to one UF student, a huge sign in front of Fort reads “Rush Phi Delt.” On August 13, the frat posted on Instagram to promote Fall 2026 rush: “We’re back.”

VII

When I first began talking to Kowalski in June 2026, she told me the Gainesville police investigation into the burnerverse accounts was on hiatus, as the officer assigned to the case was on leave. She had amassed theories about the identities behind @SteveCumfull and some of the other burners, but no charges had been filed. As such, Kowalski could not publicly comment on the status of the investigation.

“The people who did this to her are living a normal college life—they’re going out and posting and doing whatever they want,” Mandy tells me. “She’s having a really hard time with the idea that they are able to live their lives with no repercussions, while she’s judged for literally everything she does.”

In early August, however, I received a text from Kowalski: After nine months, the Gainesville police had charged Gomberg, Ahmed, and Pitfield with sexual cyber-harassment, a first-degree misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in prison and a $1,000 fine. Additionally, Ahmed has been charged with a third-degree felony: sexually cyber-harassing for financial gain. Per a sworn complaint from the Gainesville Police Department, Ahmed and Pitfield used university IP addresses to access their burner accounts—an allegation that was maddening to Kowalski, as UF had told her they dropped the Title IX investigation because the video was shot off campus.

Kowalski has also brought civil lawsuits in the Northern District of Florida against all three men, alleging sexual cyber-harassment and asking for financial damages.

A woman lying down on a couch looking at her phone.

“It’s hard enough for my friends who don’t have this on their record to get a job,” Kowalski says. “None of them can get hired at all right now. So how am I supposed to get one?”

Photograph: Natalie Keyssar

According to LinkedIn, as of September 3, both Ahmed and Pitfield were still students at the University of Florida. When asked whether they were in good standing despite the charges against them, Trauschke, the assistant director of public affairs for the University of Florida, declined to comment. “Any details regarding a student’s complaint or a student’s disciplinary process or record is protected information under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA),” she wrote.

Both Gomberg and Ahmed declined to comment through an attorney. Pitfield did not respond to repeated requests, but he filed a plea of not guilty to the misdemeanor charge last week. The LinkedIns of both Ahmed and Pitfield were deleted or edited after being contacted by WIRED. Before their accounts were altered, they listed themselves as current members of Theta Chi. And according to the Gainesville PD’s sworn complaint, as of last summer, Ahmed’s address was listed as that of the Theta Chi fraternity house.

When reached for comment, Theta Chi CEO Michael Mayer told WIRED that “the allegations made within the complaints describe abhorrent actions that run completely contrary to Theta Chi’s ideals,” referring to the charges as “reprehensible.” He added that Ahmed and Pitfield had been placed on “interim suspension” pending the results of an internal investigation.

Still, Kowalski says she’s terrified of seeing Ahmed and Pitfield on campus now that she’s back in Gainesville. “My parents are worried I’m just going to stay in my room all day and not leave,” she says. “But I like to be alone. I like lying down with a face mask on with the lights off, in my own space with the blinds closed. A lot of times in public, people come up to me, and it doesn’t really feel safe.”

But Kowalski is determined to make it work at UF and find a way to move on. She has “an ability to be sunshine in a room of thunderstorms and clouds and shitty people,” Blake says. “And every single person that said something, DM’d something, emailed something, participated in the video, shared the video, talked about the video, watched the video—every single one of them took advantage of her kindness and her ability to forgive.”

In the weeks leading up to her return to school, Kowalski mostly slept or scrolled on TikTok, posting the occasional video of herself unboxing Squishy Dumplings or belting “Total Eclipse of the Heart” in a friend’s car; she trained her new puppy, a mini goldendoodle named Rosie. She doesn’t have a job, because she quit her part-time gig as a bottle girl and server after the burnerverse harassed her employer. “It’s hard enough for my friends who don’t have this on their record to get a job,” she says. “None of them can get hired at all right now. So how am I supposed to get one?”

Her primary source of income is TikTok Live, where she “battles”—essentially, competes for tips—with creators, including livestreams with Clavicular. (They have mutual acquaintances, but she says she only started hanging out with him because she had a crush on his cameraman.) She has around 42,000 followers. Prior to getting doxed, Kowalski harbored ambitions of moving to New York or LA to become an actor; she fantasized about graduating and landing a role on a show, or even winning an Oscar. “It would be cool if I had 2,000 followers as a result of doing TikTok dances or something like that,” she says. “But being known for this? This is not fun.”

She recently took a trip to Dublin with her family, and then went to London to celebrate her friend Blake’s birthday. While there, she saw Moulin Rouge and posted cute TikToks dancing in front of the Saltburn mansion. In London, Blake says she and Kowalski went to dinner at a restaurant with panoramic views of the city, and someone even recognized her there, interrupting them to take a photo. Another night, they met a cute guy at a bar who asked for her number and social media handle. She just gave him her first name, terrified he’d find out who she was and leak it.

A woman at the beach.

Soon after the burnerverse upended Kowalski’s life, her hair started falling out and mysterious rashes showed up all over her face. She started doing intensive outpatient therapy and was eventually diagnosed with PTSD.

Photograph: Natalie Keyssar

“She has so much trauma that she can’t even have these normal experiences,” Blake says. “She can’t meet someone and not have her guard up.” Kowalski is plagued with panic attacks, and worries that she’s never going to have a partner or a family or a semblance of a normal existence. The burners “stole her life,” Blake says. “They stole her girlhood.”

VIII

In March, another girl was doxed by the burnerverse. We’ll call her Addison King. Like Kowalski, King was a student at a large university with a Division 1 football team; her name and identity went viral on X after a video purportedly showing her having sex in a bar bathroom started circulating.

The moment the video hit X, the burner accounts swung into action, reposting it, unearthing her old Instagram posts, commenting on her body, spreading rumors that she had cheated on a boyfriend back home. Kowalski saw it on X at 4 am. Her guts roiled as she lay in bed, scrolling through tweet after tweet. She found King’s Instagram and, even though it was private, DM’d her offering support. King DM’d her back, giving thanks.

Kowalski knew from her own experience what would come next: The men who’d doxed her had taken a victory lap on X Spaces, and she suspected they were doing the same thing to King. She logged on to X, joining an X Space where members of the burnerverse were plotting further ways to embarrass the young woman.

The 19-year-old sat in bed with her phone, listening to the disembodied voices casually discussing frat gossip and the Texas Rangers. “I was like, seriously? Get a life,” she says. Then the burners moved on to King. “Tell that bitch to hang from a tree,” one of them said. “Hang and dangle!”

Irate, Kowalski left the Space and turned on her camera—no makeup, her hair unbrushed. “This network of men that posted me … are doing this to more girls, just as they did to girls before me,” she says in the clip posted in late March, which now has over 271,000 likes. “And nobody seems to care.” Her fury at the people and institutions that had failed her—social media platforms, “old-ass men up at 4 in the morning talking about women’s bodies” on the internet—unfurled in torrents. “Genuinely this could happen to anyone,” she concluded. “And it’s gonna continue to happen … [unless] we stop it.”

a woman holding a dog.

In the weeks leading up to her return to school, Kowalski trained her new puppy, a mini goldendoodle named Rosie.

Photograph: Natalie Keyssar

As expected, burners descended on Kowalski’s comments section, salivating at the opportunity to continue their harassment campaign. “Bro where is the videoo [sic],” one said. “Everytime i see u speak i am always reminded of that one glorious day,” commented another.

But she was also flooded with thousands of comments of support; the burners’ insults were pushed down to the bottom of the pile, becoming a small minority. “Sometimes life takes an unexpected turn, and you find yourself with a voice you didn’t know you had,” wrote a supporter. “You have a chance [to] push for change and I’m so proud of you for taking it.” People told her they cared, that it was not her fault, that she should stay strong. The empathy from strangers wouldn’t make everything OK again; not yet, at least. But it would be a reminder that just as the burnerverse would keep going, so would she.


Let us know what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor at [email protected].


Source: Culture Latest

The Anti-Woke Right Can’t Figure Out How to Stop ‘Grand Theft Auto VI’

Rockstar Games’ best-selling Grand Theft Auto series wasn’t often accused of political sensitivity during its legendary run from the late 1990s through the early 2010s.

In fact, parents and activists denounced the franchise for exposing children to a seedy world of sex, violence, crude humor, and wanton crime. Elon Musk even claimed that he couldn’t get into the last installment, GTA V, because he was mortified to play as a character who shoots police officers.

But times (and moral panics) change. In the 13 years that fans have waited for Grand Theft Auto VI—finally out on November 19—the American right-wing grievance machine has drifted from fears of impressionable kids turning to a life of larceny to concerns that they will grow up “woke.” And despite knowing very little about the forthcoming game, the agitators of the latter movement have decided it must amount to a stealth campaign to poison the youth with depictions of gender equality, LGBTQ acceptance, and racial diversity. (Rockstar did not immediately return a request for comment.)

Since the height of Gamergate in 2014, an angst-ridden subset of male gamers have maintained a paranoid vigil against what they see as the creeping influence of women and LGBTQ developers in the gaming world. Between the feverish anticipation for GTA VI and the various delays of its release date, they’ve had ample opportunity to foment a preemptive backlash to what is sure to be a massive hit, not unlike the failed furor over supposedly “woke” elements of Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey.

“GTA 6 is a humiliation ritual for all male gamers,” an X user with the handle @Wokenessisevil complained on Tuesday, sharing a clip of the game’s two lead characters, Lucia Caminos and Jason Duval, who are in a relationship that evolves based on the player’s choices. In the scene, Lucia, the series’ first mandatory female protagonist, asks Jason to pick an outfit for her and expresses mild annoyance when he seems more or less indifferent to the options she presents.

It’s an exchange that could have been lifted from any sitcom of the past 50 years, yet it seems to have fueled a reactionary narrative about the game’s male protagonist being subjugated to a nefarious feminist agenda. Another X user recently claimed, contrary to the clip’s bog-standard depiction of a heterosexual couple, that Jason has a “gay vibe,” since no straight man would know what sequins are or use the word “cocktails,” as he does in the clip.

“The script is definitely written by a woman who has no clue what a man thinks or how he talks,” they wrote. “Jason is written as a caricature, much like what a delusional woman thinks a ‘man’ should be.”

Similarly, a gaming YouTuber seethed that Rockstar was appealing to women and gay men by showing Jason shirtless in another scene. “Gone are the days of edgy based masculine GTA games,” he wrote on X. “I could be wrong but right now it’s looking like it will be a woke fest.”

While multiple leaks and a 27-minute “extended look” preview on Netflix have revealed key details of the game, and Rockstar creatives declared their intent to realistically portray the diversity of the Miami-inspired setting and bring a fleshed-out female character into the spotlight, would-be detractors are still straining a bit for reasons to pronounce it dead on arrival. One YouTuber has convinced himself that it will subliminally brainwash players with “bisexual lighting.”

Other men have simply defaulted to rank sexism, griping that Lucia’s breasts are too small because of “they/thems” working at Rockstar or posting jokes such as: “female lead in GTA 6? i thought the whole point of GTA was to be able to drive.” An AI enthusiast used an image generator to replace a woman of color in a crop top on the game’s cover with a white blonde in a bikini.

While each new snippet of content has become grist for more manufactured outrage, the tantrums over the ideological trajectory of GTA began long ago. In 2022, for its remastered version of GTA V, Rockstar removed a number of gags and non-playable characters that critics had described as transphobic, leading to complaints from some fans.

The following year, after the game publisher released a trailer for GTA VI, trolls floated the groundless theory that the Lucia character was a transgender woman. Last month, when former video game executive Mark Kern, known for his crusades against “woke” content, deemed Lucia attractive, his followers disagreed in openly racist and misogynistic replies.

Much of this ire is aimed directly at the Rockstar team, who have been blasted for allegedly embracing “identity politics,” reportedly making efforts to avoid punching down against marginalized groups in the game’s storyline, and allowing women to contribute in any way to the franchise. A photo of female staff at the company’s studio in Scotland, shared on social media in 2019 to commemorate International Women’s Day, has circulated widely with sneering comments about how they likely ruined GTA VI.

Yet a few prominent streamers on the right, including Zack Hoyt (better known as Asmongold) and white nationalist Nick Fuentes, have taken a wait-and-see approach, declining to bash the game before checking it out for themselves. Fuentes went so far as to mock those bemoaning its creative direction. “Just go outside, touch grass,” he told one viewer who brought up the topic in his live chat.

If any of these gamers entertain fantasies of an actual boycott or commercial failure, they are bound to be disappointed. According to one estimate of preorders from a third-party data analytics firm, Rockstar has already sold 5.28 million copies of GTA VI, taking in more than $500 million in revenue. Though it is likely the most expensive game ever made, with a budget somewhere north of a billion dollars, the studio stands to easily recoup that cost, possibly by the day it comes out.

That might call for a moment of reflection from the culture warriors—or so you’d think. It’s awfully difficult, it seems, to admit that you’re so out of touch with the mainstream and have no control over the popularity of various media. They will no doubt have their objections to other aspects of the game, but once GTA VI starts breaking records, there won’t be any point in continuing the crusade. By then, the next fake controversy will be on the horizon.


Source: Culture Latest

The 9 Best TV Shows to Stream This Month (September 2026)

September is typically the time when television gets serious again. The summer’s biggest TV shows have aired their finales, the fall schedule is kicking into high gear, and streamers are rolling out everything from high-concept sci-fi to prestige dramas. There’s plenty of familiar IP in the mix, but also some genuinely original shows worth putting on your to-watch list.

While plenty of outlets will tell you what everyone is watching (see: Reacher), that’s not our goal. As always, the TV shows we’re watching this month reflect the kinds of stories WIRED covers every day—shows that explore technology, science, politics, culture, and the sometimes unsettling ways they intersect.

From returning favorites to ambitious new series—and at least one show that might rekindle your love of traditional anime—these are the TV shows we think you should make time to stream this month.

The Paper

What happens when a newspaper attempts not just to survive, but to thrive, in a world where digital media has become the norm? The Paper, a spinoff of The Office from Greg Daniels and Michael Koman, follows the staff of a struggling Midwestern paper as they attempt to revive it.

Ultimately, its idealistic new editor-in-chief Ned Sampson (Star Wars and Harry Potter alum Domhnall Gleeson) and his hungry young reporter Mare Pritti (Chelsea Frei) end up grappling with what journalism looks like in the digital age. Season 2, which arrived on September 9, finds their Toledo Truth Teller newly revitalized and searching for its next big scoop, making the show a surprisingly sharp comedy about the future of journalism—and who gets to shape it.

Lego Star Wars: The Mandalorian

Though this summer’s The Mandalorian and Grogu (which is streaming on Disney+ now) seriously underperformed at the box office, Lucasfilm is partnering with Lego to take another stab at the fan-favorite Star Wars series—which might be exactly what the franchise needs right now. Lucasfilm and Lego are going back to the beginning, reimagining all three seasons of the Pedro Pascal–starring live-action series as a 49-minute animated comedy.

For anyone who somehow managed to miss Mando and Grogu until now, the story follows Din Djarin (Pascal in the live-action series, Gavin Hammon in this iteration), a bounty hunter known as the Mandalorian, who takes a job transporting a mysterious Force-sensitive child. That child, of course, is Grogu, aka Baby Yoda. What starts as a simple assignment turns into a galaxy-spanning adventure as the pair become unlikely partners. Consider this version an entertaining way to play catch-up.

South Park

It’s hard to remember a time when the world didn’t have South Park. For nearly 30 years, audiences have watched as four potty-mouthed fourth-graders—Stan, Kyle, Cartman, and Kenny—navigate life in the bizarre mountain town of South Park, Colorado, in this very much adults-only animated comedy. Along the way, they’ve encountered alien life forms, celebrities, and Elon Musk (yes, the real one). They’ve also watched Kenny die on at least 100 occasions.

Last year, the seemingly never-ending comedy reinvented itself as a particularly pointed political satire by taking aim at figures including JD Vance, Pete Hegseth, Kristi Noem, Donald Trump, and Donald Trump’s manhood. The White House, unsurprisingly, had thoughts. And so did the Emmys; the show just took home the 2026 award for ​​Outstanding Animated Program. Clearly, creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone have no plans to take their foot off the gas; they just announced they’re taking a page out of Trump’s renaming book and rechristening the show South America for its 29th season, which premieres on September 16.

Slow Horses

What if television’s best spy show was also one of its funniest? If John le Carré and (the original) The Office had a baby, it would look and sound a lot like Slow Horses, which returns for a sixth season on September 16.

Based on Mick Herron’s Slough House book series, the series follows a dysfunctional team of MI5 misfits who are banished to the infamous Slough House unit, where they work under the notorious Jackson Lamb (Gary Oldman), a foul-mouthed, flatulent, chain-smoking wreck of a man who also happens to be the most brilliant operative in the room. It’s a prestige spy thriller that doesn’t take itself too seriously, bouncing effortlessly between shoot-outs and the kind of droll office banter you’d expect from the best workplace comedies. In a career full of memorable performances, and an Oscar to show for it, Slow Horses just might be the role Oldman is best remembered for. It’s also the project that has made Jack Lowden oddsmakers’ top pick for the next James Bond.

City of Blood

In City of Blood, an eight-episode miniseries from Germany, climate change has turned Berlin into a sweltering city teetering on the edge of collapse—and vampires are ready to take advantage of the chaos. While the privileged few live beneath a climate-controlled dome, the rest of the city’s denizens are left to battle the heat, crime, and corruption that have become part of everyday life. But when estranged sisters Bea (Lea Drinda) and Phoebe (Soma Pysall) reunite, they uncover a nefarious political plot and learn that, thanks to that aforementioned undead population, blood has become the city’s most coveted commodity. It’s a perfectly strange mix of climate dystopia, family drama, and vampire thriller. And it arrives on September 16.

MobLand

Season 2 of MobLand is almost here—whether Tom Hardy likes it or not. (Despite all the recent headlines surrounding the Oscar winner’s behind-the-scenes drama, he has already signed on for season 3.) The highly underrated, or perhaps just underseen, crime drama returns with the Harrigan family’s criminal empire under threat from rival forces, forcing their street-smart fixer Harry Da Souza (yep, Hardy) to navigate increasingly bloody internal tensions.

As Harry works to keep the fractured family from tearing itself apart, he’s aided by his trusty sidekick Zosia (Jasmine Jobson), a tech specialist who brings a distinctly 21st-century skill set to their old-school criminal enterprise headed up by Conrad (Pierce Brosnan) and Maeve Harrington (Helen Mirren). Meanwhile, rival forces close in, loyalties shift, and violence spreads through every corner of the family’s world. Expect more bloodshed, shifting allegiances, poor decisions, and one of television’s most kickass theme songs (Fontaines D.C.’s “Starburster”) when season 2 premieres on September 18.

Outlander: Blood of My Blood

Before there was Jamie and Claire, there were their parents. Like its predecessor, this Outlander prequel follows two separate timelines as it details the courtship of Jamie Fraser’s parents, Brian Fraser (Jamie Roy) and Ellen MacKenzie (Harriet Slater), in 18th-century Scotland, alongside the story of Claire Beauchamp’s parents, Henry Beauchamp (Jeremy Irvine) and Julia Moriston (Hermione Corfield), in World War I–era England. Their two love stories unfold across different time periods, weaving together romance, family drama, and the time-traveling forces that kept Outlander fans enthralled for eight seasons. The series’ second season arrives on September 18.

American Horror Story

Season 13 of Ryan Murphy and Brad Falchuk’s horror anthology is shaping up to be what has at various points been called an Avengers-esque “endgame-level event” of “greatest hits.” While the details, as always, have been kept rather quiet, what we do know is that the new season of American Horror Story will pull bits and pieces from each season of the series, with a heavy emphasis on its witchcraft-laden “Coven” and “Apocalypse” storylines.

We also know it is reassembling an all-star cast of past stars, some of whom will play double—or even triple—character duty. Among them: Murphy mainstays Sarah Paulson, Evan Peters, Jessica Lange, Kathy Bates, Emma Roberts, Billie Lourd, and Angela Bassett. The new season arrives on September 26, which gives you plenty of time to brush up on your AHS lore.

Neon Genesis Evangelion

Before Netflix gave it a new English dub—and, depending on who you ask, stirred up a lot of feelings—there was the original Japanese-language version of Neon Genesis Evangelion. The landmark anime, released in 1995, follows a group of teenagers recruited to pilot giant biomechanical weapons called Evangelions, or Evas, as they defend a postapocalyptic Tokyo (now known as Tokyo-3) from mysterious creatures, aka Angels. But what starts as a fairly straightforward battle-for-humanity story soon becomes something far stranger, delving into trauma, loneliness, identity, and human connection.

The Criterion Channel is bringing all 26 episodes of the classic (pre-Netflix) English dub to streaming for the first time, alongside the original Japanese-language version for all you purists. It’s a fitting return for one of anime’s most boundary-pushing series.


Source: Culture Latest

This Man Has a Cult Internet Following Over His Olive Garden Lifetime Pasta Pass

Everyone knows that when you’re at Olive Garden, you’re family.

But in the 44 years since the casual Italian-American restaurant chain was founded, few have embraced it with the ardor that Braden Sinclair has. In fact, way back in his Little League days, a coach named him “Breadsticks.”

“I had to go to Olive Garden for my birthday, ate too much, missed an entire game,” Sinclair tells WIRED. “One of my coaches decided that because of my initials being B.S., and my number being 11—which he said looked like breadsticks—and then that story, that I had to be called ‘Breadsticks’ for the rest of the season.”

He maintained that close relationship with the chain for many years, until, in 2019, he was rewarded with an almost unfathomable distinction: Sinclair is one of just 50 human beings on the planet to ever secure an Olive Garden Lifetime Pasta Pass.

Unlike the thousands of 13-week Never Ending Pasta Passes that the chain has offered at various intervals since 2014—this summer, a batch of 10,000, priced at $100 apiece, sold out within seconds—Sinclair’s heavy gold card bears no expiration date. It entitles him to as much pasta, toppings, breadsticks, and soup or salad as he cares to eat, for as long as the chain endures and he remains a loyal customer. (No delivery, though, to be clear. A pasta bowl so bottomless demands that one take a seat of honor for the dine-in experience.)

How exactly does Sinclair wield his kingly rights at Olive Garden? All is revealed on his new website, Lifetimepastapass.com, where he crunches the many numbers—both financial and dietary—on his many meals there. And, with a continually updated poll that decides what he should order the next time he drops in, it’s easily the closest you’ll ever get to having the lifetime pass yourself.

Braden Sinclair in front of an Olive Garden restaurant.
Braden Sinclair can eat unlimited pasta at Olive Garden anytime he wants.Photograph: Bonnie Durham

Sinclair nabbed his license to feast during a special promotion, when Olive Garden announced that the first 50 people to buy a temporary pasta pass would have the opportunity to upgrade it to the lifetime pass for an extra $400. To this day, Sinclair wonders if his timing was really that good or if the company deliberately selected him to receive the ultimate prize.

“I had sort of a joking relationship with their Instagram for years, just like chatting back and forth,” he explains, adding that it felt a little “weird” and something like “divine intervention” that he won given his coziness with the brand. An Olive Garden vice president of marketing FaceTimed him with the good news, he recalls.

Reactions to the card from Olive Garden employees range from awe to confusion. “They always take it back to the kitchen, show it to people,” Sinclair says. “Managers will come out and ask questions. The other end of the spectrum has been having to kind of prove it’s real, which is rare, and I totally understand. Like, if I managed a restaurant and someone came in with a gold card that said I don’t need to pay, I would also have questions.”

Now a 33-year-old father of two young kids, Sinclair doesn’t gorge on heaping plates of carbohydrates the way he used to (and, since frequenting Olive Garden makes him more conscientious about the rest of his diet, he’s avoided packing on the pounds). But he says the Lifetime Pasta Pass somewhat justifies his continued fixation on the restaurant, which was a familiar comfort when his family temporarily relocated from Maine to Wisconsin during his childhood. In 2016, he paid homage to the place with a tattoo of its famous rotary cheese grater; the caption reads “SAY WHEN.” He also began collecting vintage T-shirts that the chain had released in the 1980s and 1990s.

This year, Sinclair unveiled the project that brought all of his Olive Garden experiences together in one place. Lifetimepastapass.com documents his “infinite tour of Italy” by showcasing not only his backstory and extensive merch collection but all the data you could ever want about how he has used his rare privilege: number of restaurant visits since 2019 (112), bowls of pasta eaten (152), calories consumed (154,817), meal value ($1,878.87) and total tips ($607.00).

You can also keep tabs on a map of which locations Sinclair has tried—while the South Portland, Maine, restaurant is his home base, he has ventured up and down the Eastern Seaboard. Other charts show his most favored pasta type (rigatoni), sauce (alfredo), and topping (crispy chicken fritta), as well as the monthly frequency of his Olive Garden visits; he dined there nine times in August, the most since he set a personal record of 20 visits in October 2019, shortly after winning the pass.

With a decade of experience in data analytics and visualization, Sinclair saw all this as a fun application of his talents. But he also wanted people to have “skin in the game,” as he puts it—so he built a dashboard where anyone can vote on the combination of ingredients that make up his next pasta order.

“I thought it was just gonna be a joke among my friends,” Sinclair says. “You know, share it on Instagram, so maybe 10 of my friends would go in and vote, and then the next day five, and then the third day no one would care, and it would be over.” Instead, after he shared the project on a couple of subreddits, he was stunned to tally over 700 votes on his next meal. He wound up eating angel hair with spicy alfredo (a new sauce offering) and crispy shrimp fritta.

“A big reason why I wanted to do this is I just kept getting rigatoni with alfredo, five-cheese marinara, and crispy chicken, like on repeat,” Sinclair says. “I was like, ‘I need to branch out.’” His best discovery so far? “I realized that alfredo and meatballs is an insane combination,” he says. “It’s so good.”

In some ways, Lifetimepastapass.com is a reflection of Sinclair’s belief that the card comes with great responsibility. Besides tipping diligently, he also skips the refills, aiming to be a “respectful” and “low-impact” diner who doesn’t flaunt his status or make a shift harder for staff. “I see some pictures of people with the [regular] pasta passes who go crazy,” he says. “Bowls full of grated Parmesan just because they can.” Meticulously tracking his own Olive Garden journey toward various virtual “trophies” earned by hitting benchmarks in categories such as “lifetime breadsticks eaten” (he’ll reach the bronze level at 100, gold at 1,000) and “longest streaks of consecutive weeks with at least one visit” seems, by comparison, a kind of reverence for the institution.

If there’s an unexpected downside to the Lifetime Pasta Pass, it may be a certain loneliness at the top. Because Covid-19 hit shortly after people claimed the cards, the promotion has been largely memory-holed, and whatever plans Olive Garden could have had to celebrate or connect the winners were never realized. Sinclair has stumbled upon only a couple of other passholders via social media and has no idea how often others may go to the restaurant these days.

Meanwhile, it’s not always easy to convince your pals to meet up at a restaurant just because you eat there for free. “There’s only so many times I can go sit at the Olive Garden by myself,” Sinclair says. “I have some friends who are nice enough to go with me, but oftentimes they’ll just kind of sit there and eat some breadsticks.” And though Sinclair’s wife is an admitted fan of the chain—she’s eaten there with him since their high school days and promised in her wedding vows to go whenever he wants—he finds it “wisest” to seek alternatives whenever they manage a kids-free date night.

The good news is that Sinclair’s 4-year-old is a likely Olive Garden devotee in the making. “I’ll probably start bringing my oldest son a little more just because he’s obsessed with pasta,” he says. “I think he’ll genuinely enjoy it.”

Just not before a Little League game, of course.


Source: Culture Latest

The Trump Alien ‘Disclosure Speech’ Rumors Are Reaching a Fever Pitch

In 2006, Donald Trump was firing people on The Apprentice and Dr. Phil was daytime television’s reigning tough-love therapist.

Twenty years later, the former is president of the United States, the latter, his informal UFO ambassador—recently trusted with unreleased government files on unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) to gauge how the public might handle what’s inside.

“Here’s what comes in stages. First they acknowledge it, then they confirm it’s real, then they tell you where it’s from,” Dr. Phil said in an August 7 Instagram video discussing UAP disclosure. “And somewhere down that road, maybe, is the big one—the government of the United States standing at a podium and saying out loud, we are not alone.”

For most of 2026, a rumor has consumed the world of UFOlogy: President Trump is sitting on a finished speech confirming humanity isn’t alone. Whether the “disclosure speech” actually exists is a topic of rabid discussion on X, the r/UFO subreddit, and dozens of extraterrestrial-curious podcasts, but the reasons so many people believe in it are very real. Humans are arguably experiencing the most consequential era for the UFO scene since the ’40s and ’50s, when a mysterious crash outside Roswell, New Mexico, and unexplained radar blips over Washington, DC, birthed decades of legends of little green men and flying-saucers.

There’s no doubt that the government has been engaging with the topic. Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently confirmed that Stephen Miller, one of the most powerful figures in the White House, has been handed the UAP portfolio.

Tim Gallaudet, a retired Navy rear admiral who helped run the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration during Trump’s first term, testified before Congress about UAP in 2024, and now sits on a UAP Science Advisory Council reporting to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. He called the increased government interest “a total change in executive-branch transparency from the last 80 years.”

But he’s unsure if that would ever culminate in a speech from a sitting president, because they would “have to acknowledge that we’re not in control, that we’re not the highest level of intelligence on the planet, and that’s going to be a very hard thing for any government to admit.”

A White House spokesperson tells WIRED via email that “No such speech is planned—rather, the administration continues to release files as they become available, and the public to make up their own minds about the information uncovered.”

For believers, the modern UAP disclosure began in 2017, when a New York Times article revealed a secret Pentagon program quietly investigating UAPs. The Pentagon went on to confirm in 2020 that leaked videos of Navy pilots tracking seemingly impossible objects were real. A 2021 intelligence report conceded the phenomena existed and remained unexplained, and in 2022 the government established an official investigation office. Then, from 2022 to 2025, Congress held yearly public hearings where pilots, military officers, and intelligence veterans (including Gallaudet) testified under oath.

What’s also novel is that UAP disclosure has bipartisan support. Both the House task force on declassifying federal secrets and the House UAP Caucus are made up of legislators from across the aisle.

This year, the drumbeat of government interest turned into a drumroll about a potential Trump speech. In January, filmmaker Mark Christopher Lee claimed a disclosure speech was imminent, pegged to the 79th anniversary of the alleged Roswell crash on July 8. Few took him seriously.

But in February, the president’s daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, gave the idea new legs, saying on the Pod Force One podcast she’d heard Trump had a speech ready touching on “some sort of extraterrestrial life.” Around the same time, Barack Obama mused in a podcast interview with Brian Tyler Cohen that aliens are “real” before conceding “I haven’t seen them.” Trump then accused his predecessor of disclosing classified information, and announced that he was directing agencies to release their files on “alien and extraterrestrial life.”

What followed was bizarre even by this administration’s standards. In May, Trump posted an AI-generated image of himself escorting a handcuffed gray alien, and a mysterious loading page appeared on the domain aliens.gov, leading to rampant speculation within the UFO community that the big reveal was coming. But when the White House finally launched aliens.gov late in the month, it ended up being a Star Wars–style website that functioned as an ICE tip line—with aliens being a reference to undocumented people.

The machinery of disclosure kept grinding forward. Since May, the government has released five batches of declassified videos and documents onto the Department of War’s website. Detractors say the files lack context and the videos prove little.

Even after the Roswell date passed, rumors about a disclosure speech intensified. In late July, Liberation Times—an independent news website with a record of breaking UAP stories—reported that a speech confirming some UFOs are of non-human origin had been prepared for Trump.

The site’s founder, Christopher Sharp, tells WIRED the story began with a call from a source he deeply trusts.

“They basically said, ‘Look, I’m quite shaken, because it looks like Trump may make some kind of announcement on UAP disclosure’.” Another source described the speech itself, he says, alleging it basically reads, “we’re not alone, we have captured some of these or retrieved some of these things, they’re of non-human origin, and that there is a reverse engineering effort.”

Sharp was also told Trump wouldn’t deliver it unless unspecified conditions were met.

“If you’re the president, you have to be sure that there’s firm evidence,” he says. “The worst thing you can do is come out with this speech and then whatever you put out could be debunked straight away … You’ll go down in history as a laughingstock.”

In August, the rumor hit a fever pitch. Robert Bigelow, the billionaire aerospace mogul who has bankrolled UFO research for decades and once owned Utah’s infamous Skinwalker Ranch (a 500-acre plot of land renowned for alleged alien and paranormal activity and later the namesake of a popular History Channel series), told veteran Las Vegas journalist George Knapp that he’d met Trump in the Oval Office months earlier and personally handed him a speech containing a single sentence: “A non-human, intelligent presence has been on Earth for a very long time, using spacecraft and with performances completely beyond our capabilities and our human physics.”

Bigelow said he advised the president to deliver the line casually, on his way to boarding Air Force One—no evidence, no press conference, just confirmation. Trump hasn’t said it. Yet.

If the cycle of presidents and UFO disclosure feels familiar, that’s because it is. For nearly 80 years, someone has always supposedly been on the verge of revealing the truth, but no president has ever delivered.

“Politicians overpromise,” says Greg Eghigian, a professor of history and bioethics at Penn State and author of After the Flying Saucers Came. “The reality is that even presidents are not privy to a lot of classified information that lies within the bowels of the military and intelligence community bureaucracy.”

Still, for the believers, the stakes justify the hope.

“Often in the mainstream, when this topic gets brought up, there’s a giggle factor. I can tell you who is not giggling about this: senior members of the administration, senior intelligence officials, senior members of the military, senior members of Congress,” says Jordan Flowers, executive director of the Disclosure Foundation, a nonprofit that advocates for UAP transparency. “When the door closes, no one ever says, ‘Oh, this is all made up, isn’t it?’ No. The door closes and they say, ‘We know there’s something happening here, we know this is serious, what do we do about it?’”

But that discourse still hasn’t been confirmed, at least in a meaningful way to the general public.

“A speech from the President of the United States confirming the existence of things in our airspace that we do not understand would unequivocally contribute to the public taking this issue seriously,” says Flowers.

Eghigian, however, isn’t so sure a Trump pronouncement would settle anything, particularly from “this president, who has a long history of not telling the truth.”

If the past is any indicator, this could be another nothingburger.

“Unless something radically different happens, which I know a lot of people are counting on, what we could probably expect is that this will eventually die down,” he says, citing an 80-year history of “intense moments where societies are really focused on the subject, and then all of a sudden interest wanes, and then all of a sudden it appears again.”

Right now, interest is arguably at an all-time high. Few politicians enjoy a public spectacle as much as Trump, and what spectacle could be bigger than news that transcends our planet, and potentially our galaxy. Maybe the rumor just becomes another footnote on presidents and UFO lore. Or maybe it becomes the most important proclamation in human history, delivered by a reality TV star, with a talk show shrink by his side.


Source: Culture Latest