I disagree. Low sec is merely that, Low Security! This by EVE Echoes ISK definition signifies concord will set up some effort, but not a great deal. Same reason why gate camping in reduced takes more effort than it's in null. If I would like to camp at low which means I need minimum a dedicated tank and some friends to help seal the deal quickly, then deal with the offender timer. In null I could by my self sit at a gate and be a dick all day.
Seems functioning as planned if you ask me.Yeah, low security, it is not everywhere, only at gates and stations.Low security does not mean folks need to have immunity.And they don't. If they are trying to mine or rat or do anything else from the machine, they are entirely open to anything. Lock them down, kill them, yes please. However, at gates or stations there's security, since it's a low security method, there some security, not a great deal, but enough for your gates and stations.It's somewhat of a compromise. It is a portable game, and travel should be fairly easy IMO. Not in Null Sec naturally, but why not in non?
You ignore the fact that mission runners and haulers if having gate resistance have complete immunity. There is no way to target them and that's bullshit.This is not EO. Keep that things to Null for the cellular market.And we are back to that tired argument. Why is it because one factor of EO that I like mechanically means I need to EVE Mobile ISK Cheap return to a game I enjoy? Why does mobile need to mean effortless and idle simulator?I have two complaints about EE. Audits and how safe low/null sec is. I enjoy everything else they have done with the game.